Teams

LWKI-King/CSD

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 7.5 Women 40s

15 players · average NTRP 3.54 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 11 9:30 AM
Andrea McRorie
Sep 18 9:30 AM
Jetton Park
Sep 25 9:30 AM
Sharon CanteyTracy Podesta
Oct 2 11:00 AM
Cornelius Park
Oct 9 9:30 AM
vs N/A
Whitney King
2026-09-04vs LJJO-Joiner/NMPLost 12
W#1 DoublesTanner Jordan / Marilou Martin vs Kelly Kennard / Melinda Urban6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesEmalie Levine / Christina Mullen vs Paige Mcguirk / Karla Williams6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Collins / Sharyn Darden vs Jennifer Joiner / Kathy Ciambotti4-6, 4-6
2026-08-28vs LCAP-Aprile/RRLost 12
W#1 DoublesJana Ritter / Kristy Del Monte vs Meredith Ortiz / Ana Endsjo6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTonya Watson / Tanner Jordan vs Stephanie Nixdorf / Michelle Bowe2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Rogers / Christina Mullen vs Kimberly Haigney / Terri Utz4-6, 3-6
2026-08-21vs LLRU-Russell-Smith/LNRSCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennie Carruth / Jana Ritter vs Peg Blomme / Karen Ray6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEmalie Levine / Anna Wiseman vs Caroline Ray / Lori Anne Emlong3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharyn Darden / Tanner Jordan vs Leah Russell / Melissa Smith3-6, 2-6
2026-08-14vs LNCH-Cheatham/PACWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennie Carruth / Marilou Martin vs Cindy Houser / Jennifer Jenkins6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristy Del Monte / Sayra Brynn vs Tanya McMaster / Jan Wildman6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesWhitney King / Melissa Collins vs Lois Forti / Elizabeth Norton7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 7.5 Women 40s
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LSCL-Clancy/CRP2042544
2LJJO-Joiner/NMP2051548
3LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 +2042551
4LKLR-Riccardelli/Westport1021317
5LWKI-King/CSD1142444
6LJHI-Higgins/Bailey1142761
7LLRU-Russell-Smith/LNRSC1133861
8LMKPO-Portaro/Jetton1133859
9LSCA-Cantey-Podesta/Peninsula1124861
10LAMC-McRorie-Dudan/Jetton0112427
11LNKA-Kayton-Robinson/CSD SPARTAN 7.50112435
12LNCH-Cheatham/PAC0103638
13LCAP-Aprile/RR0224966
14LJRO-Rode/Skybrook02151165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jennie Carruth
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.60
Jana Ritter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Anna Wiseman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Marilou Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Kristy Del Monte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Emalie Levine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Christina Mullen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Tonya Watson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Kristen Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Tanner Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Whitney King
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Tina Riedell
published 3.5
3.28
Sayra Brynn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Melissa Collins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Sharyn Darden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jana Ritter + Kristy Del Monte4165% gamesnot enough data
Jana Ritter + Whitney King4155% gamesnot enough data
Marilou Martin + Whitney King3251% gamesnot enough data
Jana Ritter + Tina Riedell404 matchesnot enough data
Tonya Watson + Whitney King134 matchesnot enough data
Tonya Watson + Kristen Rogers213 matchesnot enough data
Christina Mullen + Kristen Rogers213 matchesnot enough data
Sayra Brynn + Kristy Del Monte213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennie Carruth
212W–100L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%56%43%
3.98
3.5
Jana Ritter
109W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.60
3.5
Anna Wiseman
28W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.57
3.5
Marilou Martin
110W–88L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
3.5
Kristy Del Monte
40W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Emalie Levine
36W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Christina Mullen
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Tonya Watson
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kristen Rogers
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Tanner Jordan
53W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Whitney King
76W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Tina Riedell
56W–86L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Sayra Brynn
74W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Melissa Collins
10W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Sharyn Darden
53W–69L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.