Teams

2EAST-ABLIN AD18&O 25NW MO SEM F5

2023 SEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 2.5 WOMEN MON PM SEM

10 players · average NTRP 2.81 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-07-24vs 1PH-NEATON AD18&O 25NW MO SEM F5Won 21
L#1 DoublesMeloney Moore / Louise Chapple vs Kim Dooley / Lisa Barnett3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJodie Bosheers vs Trish DeFrain3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMissy Ablin / Sabrina Frazier vs Diane Neaton / Beth Mullally7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesPatricia Jones / Louise Chapple vs Christina Stickney / Lisa Li6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMissy Ablin vs Kristen Yablonski6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMeloney Moore / Jen Lyn Preslwy vs Sydney Seitters / Ashley Devonshire2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJodie Bosheers / Jen Lyn Preslwy vs Carol Malone / Christine Kraase2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHaley Reid vs Tanya Palazzolo3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Jones / Donna Saxton vs Lynn Gentz / Karyn Naimo2-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesLouise Chapple / Sabrina Frazier vs Denise Weisgerber / Laura Schepper6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJodie Bosheers vs Christine Fend6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHaley Reid / Jen Lyn Preslwy vs Deanne Seifert / Kirsten Weller6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesHaley Reid / Jen Lyn Preslwy vs Jennifer Hindman / Lyndsay Bohannon0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLouise Chapple vs Ana Rotar2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAshley McLeod / Meloney Moore vs Sirlei Mendes / Casey Newman2-6, 2-6
2023-06-12vs 1PH-NEATON AD18&O 25NW MO SEM F5Won 21
W#1 DoublesAshley McLeod / Louise Chapple vs Amy Walton / Diane Neaton6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDonna Saxton vs Trish DeFrain1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMissy Ablin / Meloney Moore vs Bridgid VanHowe / Melanie Muchortow4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJodie Bosheers / Haley Reid vs Matraca Kolb / Christina Stickney4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAshley McLeod vs Kristen Yablonski4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMissy Ablin / Sabrina Frazier vs Ashley Devonshire / Sydney Seitters6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesJodie Bosheers / Jen Lyn Preslwy vs Deanne Seifert / Denise Weisgerber6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHaley Reid vs Laura Schepper6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMeloney Moore / Louise Chapple vs Erin Durren / Christine Fend6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesPatricia Jones / Louise Chapple vs Tanya Palazzolo / Karyn Naimo6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMissy Ablin vs Lynn Gentz6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMeloney Moore / Jen Lyn Preslwy vs Carol Malone / Christine Kraase4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAshley McLeod / Donna Saxton vs Jennifer Langreet / Lyndsay Bohannon0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSabrina Frazier vs Ana Rotar0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMissy Ablin / Haley Reid vs Jamie Lichtle / Casey Newman3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings28 teams · 2.5 WOMEN MON PM SEM

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jodie Bosheers
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.70
Ashley McLeod
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Haley Reid
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.59
Sabrina Frazier
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.46
Jen Lyn Preslwy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Donna Saxton
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.13
Patricia Jones
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.98
Meloney Moore
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Louise Chapple
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
Missy Ablin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Haley Reid + Jen Lyn Preslwy2346% games−2.5% vs expected
Ashley McLeod + Sabrina Frazier314 matchesnot enough data
Ashley McLeod + Haley Reid134 matchesnot enough data
Meloney Moore + Jen Lyn Preslwy044 matchesnot enough data
Sabrina Frazier + Meloney Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Sabrina Frazier + Jen Lyn Preslwy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jodie Bosheers
24W–15L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Ashley McLeod
54W–50L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Haley Reid
37W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Sabrina Frazier
80W–86L career · 7 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Jen Lyn Preslwy
27W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Donna Saxton
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Patricia Jones
14W–19L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Meloney Moore
12W–39L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Louise Chapple
8W–2L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Missy Ablin
30W–5L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.