Teams

Duval - Williams Y - Cowden

2021 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Men · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-04-01vs Marsh Creek - HolubWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndy Fricke / Michael Abernathy vs Tim Cole / Bruce King7-5, 6-2
2021-03-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndy Fricke / Michael Abernathy vs Jeffrey Nelson / Nick Whitney6-3, 6-2
2021-03-25vs Sawgrass - WalshWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharlie Chacos / Andy Fricke vs Bruce Gillie / Michael Peters6-3, 6-1
2021-03-13vs Sawgrass - WalshWon 10
W#4 DoublesAndy Fricke / Charles McGehee vs Bill Hetzel / Timothy Carless6-3, 6-4
2021-03-11Won 10
W#4 DoublesCharles McGehee / Richard Rivas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-02-27vs Marsh Creek - HolubSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAndy Fricke / Michael Abernathy vs Gary Holub / Tim Anderson6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesYoung Lee / Charles McGehee vs John Hannah / Ed Dodson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-02-20vs Baymeadows - CruzWon 10
W#4 DoublesMichael Abernathy / Andy Fricke vs Greg Burley / Joel Salvador6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndy Fricke / Michael Abernathy vs Kevin McInerny / Stephen Kowkabany6-1, 6-1
2021-01-23vs Ponte Vedra - DeJesusLost 01
L#4 DoublesAndy Fricke / Young Lee vs Bob Baxley / Bert DuMars3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2021-01-17vs Julington Creek - BelcherWon 10
W#3 DoublesKenneth Black / Andy Fricke vs Forrest Gibson / Barry Argalas6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Herve Devos
published 4
3.40
Andy Fricke
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Robert Phillips
published
Charles McGehee
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Richard Rivas
published
3.23
Erik Berger
published 3.5
3.01
Mark Cabler
published
Kenneth Black
published
Raymond Zenisek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles McGehee + Andy Fricke134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Herve Devos
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Andy Fricke
106W–71L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
Robert Phillips
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Charles McGehee
46W–55L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Richard Rivas
14W–12L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Erik Berger
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Mark Cabler
11W–18L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
Kenneth Black
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Raymond Zenisek
1W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.