Teams

RID KENNEDY/HARR

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 2.5

16 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-18vs SO JENNINGS/VOIGTWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Harr / Stefanie Goff vs Kelley Burt / Lizzie Whitmire6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesShari Alvarez vs Callie Jennings4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Jo Klein / Taylor Bevan vs Lauren Team / Whitney Franklin6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-14vs BIR CONRAD/LINGTONLost 03
L#1 DoublesShari Alvarez / Erin Bosley vs Shannon Morgan / Shaun Lington0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Wear vs Erica Mulcahy1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTanya Henderson / Jaime Lokey vs Dahlia Wright / Hetal Kumar6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-07vs MCL MEYER/THOMASLost 12
L#1 DoublesLyndsay Kennedy / Laura Jo Klein vs Susan Cole / Kimberly Houk3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKori Steiner vs Hilaire Baumgartner0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Harr / Taylor Bevan vs Leanne Couch / Alyssa Honer6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Emily Nichols
published
2.31
Taylor Bevan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Stefanie Goff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Amanda Wear
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Lauren Harr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.19
Lyndsay Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Laura Jo Klein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.17
Jamie Raymond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Blair Boydstun
published 2.5
2.14
Shelley Sonnonstine
published
2.00
Shari Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
1.95
Kelsey Schuler
published
1.92
Kori Steiner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Erin Bosley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jaime Lokey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tanya Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefanie Goff + Kelsey Schuler1627% gamesnot enough data
Lyndsay Kennedy + Laura Jo Klein224 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Bevan + Kori Steiner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Nichols
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%6%94%
2.72
Taylor Bevan
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
Stefanie Goff
4W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Amanda Wear
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Harr
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Lyndsay Kennedy
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Laura Jo Klein
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Jamie Raymond
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Blair Boydstun
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Shelley Sonnonstine
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Shari Alvarez
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Kelsey Schuler
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Kori Steiner
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Erin Bosley
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jaime Lokey
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tanya Henderson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.