Teams

7-LDubois-Eno

2023 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-18vs 5-KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesChristina Pipkin vs Rhiannon Ludington5-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesLaura Dubois vs Valerie Michael2-6, 2-6
2023-07-11Won 20
W#2 SinglesCristina Raiti vs Lakynne Sargent6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLaura Dubois vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-28vs 1-DAllen-DFCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKelly Conklin vs Sarah Parker3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKirby Jethro vs Ali Leblanc6-4, 6-0
2023-06-27vs 4-JDeConto/AKlein-EnoLost 03
L#1 SinglesKelly Conklin vs Krissy Anderson0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Santae Cooper3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLaura Dubois vs Amanda Alexander Klein2-6, 2-6
2023-06-13vs 6-Mlong-Eno-18 3.0 SinglesWon 10
W#3 SinglesKirby Jethro vs Kari Lovetinsky7-6, 6-0
2023-06-06vs 2-LSimmons-SVCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesChristina Pipkin vs Erin McElligott6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesCristina Raiti vs Laura Caldwell5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Kristin Cooley
published
3.54
Loralie Bible
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Christina Pipkin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.89
Kelly Conklin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.82
Kirby Jethro
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.58
Cristina Raiti
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.56
Laura Dubois
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Cooley + Loralie Bible12261% games+5.3% vs expected
Laura Dubois + Kelly Conklin7454% gamesnot enough data
Kirby Jethro + Cristina Raiti3543% gamesnot enough data
Kirby Jethro + Laura Dubois2448% gamesnot enough data
Laura Dubois + Cristina Raiti4256% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Conklin + Cristina Raiti3345% gamesnot enough data
Kirby Jethro + Christina Pipkin314 matchesnot enough data
Laura Dubois + Christina Pipkin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Cooley
34W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Loralie Bible
182W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
3
Christina Pipkin
86W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Kelly Conklin
71W–81L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Kirby Jethro
37W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cristina Raiti
36W–44L career · 6 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Laura Dubois
82W–106L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.