Teams

LCTA40/Witheford/WildDunes

STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Women - 6.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-21vs LCTA40/Anderson/CreeksideLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrandy Mcmahon / Kristin Whalen vs Sarah Sass / Currie Boyd4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Baxter / Elizabeth Jackson vs Amy Anderson / Ashlee Henney2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJaime Ginney / Maria Johnson vs Lauren Pogrob / Mary Catherine Arthur1-6, 6-7
2025-08-06vs LCTA40/Barkley/MPRWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathi Schuitema / Bonnie Jennings vs Emma Shuman / Karen Lewis6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKim Raines / Heather Koepenick vs Amy Jarck / Elaine Herbst6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJill Ilario / Ashley Gaston vs Karen Felder / Danher Wang6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-17vs LCTA40/MillerCirifalco/DunesWestWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Jackson / Barbara Jorgensen vs Marissa Regan / Christy Miller6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLynette Korte / Ashley Gaston vs Denise Lauer / Trudy Billings7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Johnson / Jaime Ginney vs Paige Kuehmeier / Amanda Mammele6-2, 6-0
2025-07-10vs LCTA40/Seblonka/BrickyardWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Raines / Courtney Byrd vs Faye Bull / Kathryn Whitaker6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBarbara Jorgensen / Bonnie Jennings vs Sharon Gerald / Gretchen Looney6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHeather Witheford / Heather Koepenick vs Aimee Hoffman / Janet Winch6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Kim Raines
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Heather Koepenick
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Emily Baxter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Bonnie Jennings
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Brandy Mcmahon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Kristin Whalen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Heather Witheford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Barbara Jorgensen
published 3.5
3.21
Kathi Schuitema
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Jill Ilario
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Elizabeth Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Courtney Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Jaime Ginney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Leslie Bacon
published
2.93
Tara Amaral
published
2.69
Ashley Gaston
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Lynette Korte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Morgan Marshall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Witheford + Bonnie Jennings8171% games+19.7% vs expected
Brandy Mcmahon + Courtney Byrd6071% games+17.0% vs expected
Brandy Mcmahon + Jaime Ginney5257% games+12.2% vs expected
Brandy Mcmahon + Bonnie Jennings5162% games+10.1% vs expected
Jill Ilario + Kim Raines6359% games+8.6% vs expected
Barbara Jorgensen + Jill Ilario11457% games+5.3% vs expected
Brandy Mcmahon + Kristin Whalen7750% games+2.7% vs expected
Bonnie Jennings + Christy Humphries5356% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Raines
50W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Heather Koepenick
73W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Emily Baxter
24W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Bonnie Jennings
61W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Brandy Mcmahon
74W–74L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Kristin Whalen
43W–53L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Heather Witheford
63W–53L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Jorgensen
28W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathi Schuitema
41W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jill Ilario
38W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Elizabeth Jackson
45W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Courtney Byrd
49W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Jaime Ginney
39W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
Leslie Bacon
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Tara Amaral
44W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Ashley Gaston
41W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Christy Humphries
25W–44L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Lynette Korte
24W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Morgan Marshall
28W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.