Teams

Sonterra Hot Shots

2025 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKDAY WOMEN · 3.0 Women Monday

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-28vs Dominion RebelsWon 32
W#1 DoublesElsa Ang / Nora Espinoza vs Sarah Scoggin / Maribel Cadena6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Ison vs Karina Mendoza6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Womack / Alice Engh vs Janeth J Ayoub / JENE MILLER4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAdela Gonzalez vs Monica Esparza7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDiana Garrity / DANAH CHREITAH vs Kate Monroe / Nashelly Arnaud6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Erika Moe
published
3.13
Tanya Power
published
3.01
Adela Gonzalez
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.96
Deborah Lange
published 3
2.92
Mariana Reynoso
published
2.91
Alice Engh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Jessica Ison
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Nora Espinoza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Isamara Taylor
published
2.83
Margarita Kirk
published
2.79
Lisa Womack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Delaina Harrison
published 3
2.72
DANAH CHREITAH
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Stephanie Tobin
published
2.54
Diana Garrity
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elsa Ang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adela Gonzalez + Tanya Power2349% games−9.7% vs expected
Jessica Ison + Tanya Power224 matchesnot enough data
Isamara Taylor + Alice Engh224 matchesnot enough data
Margarita Kirk + Adela Gonzalez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erika Moe
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Tanya Power
29W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Adela Gonzalez
11W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Deborah Lange
28W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Mariana Reynoso
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
3
Alice Engh
10W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Jessica Ison
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Nora Espinoza
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Isamara Taylor
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Margarita Kirk
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Lisa Womack
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Delaina Harrison
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
3
DANAH CHREITAH
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Stephanie Tobin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Diana Garrity
5W–10L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Elsa Ang
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.