Teams

1-MLong-Eno 55+ 6.5

2022 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · Eno River 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-13vs 2-DBaker-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesNancy Sickel / Jennifer Edmunds vs Kellie Johnson / SusanLee Caruso6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTerry Summers / Gabriela Stefan vs Karen Maus / Lilie Bonzani7-5, 6-2
2022-09-08vs 4-MParker-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerry Summers / Marylynn Baldwin vs Karen Wood / Theresa Rosario-Jansen1-6, 0-6
2022-09-01vs 3-DLiller-HSLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary T Long / Nancy Sickel vs Donna Spero / Dori Liller3-6, 1-6
2022-08-18vs 4-MParker-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Flynn / Nancy Sickel vs Karen Wood / Theresa Rosario-Jansen3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTerry Summers / Gabriela Stefan vs Bracha Blanc / Mary Parker3-6, 0-6
2022-08-11vs 3-DLiller-HSLost 02
L#2 DoublesMary T Long / Nancy Sickel vs Sally Mauriello / Dori Liller3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Flynn / Terry Summers vs Pat Rowe / Linda Stiebris6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-04vs 2-DBaker-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerry Summers / Alise McNeill vs Karen Maus / SusanLee Caruso7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Nancy Sickel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Laura Flynn
published
2.83
Alise McNeill
published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
published
2.74
Terry Summers
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.45
Kimberly Roberts
published
2.42
Jennifer Edmunds
published
2.37
Gabriela Stefan
published 2.5
Michelle Trinco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Summers + Mary T Long3258% gamesnot enough data
Alise McNeill + Nancy Sickel033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nancy Sickel
63W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Laura Flynn
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Alise McNeill
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Terry Summers
54W–43L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Kimberly Roberts
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
0%66%34%
2.45
Jennifer Edmunds
14W–34L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.42
2.5
Gabriela Stefan
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
0%85%15%
2.37
Michelle Trinco
20W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.