Teams

CROWN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - ASPEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-19vs GSCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMike Cassetty / Peter Jacobson vs James Mears / Max Weiss6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAarjave Shah / DAVID STRAHM vs Derron Cloud / Phillip Montez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-12vs GSCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMike Cassetty / DAVID STRAHM vs Greg Hooker / Max Weiss2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKen Wanko vs Derek Wheatley5-7, 5-7
2023-09-05vs GSCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKen Wanko / DAVID STRAHM vs James Mears / Daniel West2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMike Cassetty / Peter Jacobson vs Derron Cloud / Phillip Montez7-6, 6-2
2023-08-29vs GSCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKen Wanko / Mike Cassetty vs Derron Cloud / James Mears7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesPeter Jacobson vs Derek Wheatley1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAarjave Shah / DAVID STRAHM vs Max Weiss / Greg Hooker0-6, 2-5
2023-08-22vs GSCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKen Wanko / Peter Jacobson vs Derron Cloud / Daniel West6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDouglas Hayes vs Derek Wheatley4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMike Cassetty / DAVID STRAHM vs James Mears / Max Weiss3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - ASPEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BASALT5113514108
2GSCC SILVER5113514129
3GSCC WHITE3310817128
4CROWN339919133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Douglas Hayes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.55
Ken Wanko
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Aarjave Shah
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
DAVID STRAHM
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mike Cassetty
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Peter Jacobson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Tomas Franceschi
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Douglas Hayes
22W–9L career · type M · 1 line in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Ken Wanko
22W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Aarjave Shah
22W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
DAVID STRAHM
7W–6L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Cassetty
18W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Jacobson
22W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tomas Franceschi
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.