Teams

Southside - Shuman

2024 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women Winter · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-09vs Huguenot - JohnsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPolly Curole / Lezita Davis vs Diane Stone / Karen Miller0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJeralyn Forcier / Eleanor Mitchell vs Lois Robichaud / Connie Rouls6-1, 6-2
2024-03-02vs San Jose - HennessyLost 01
L#1 DoublesEleanor Mitchell / Jeralyn Forcier vs Carmel Buchanan / Jessica Mills4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-02-24vs Duval/Pinho/55&Over7.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesPolly Curole / Lezita Davis vs Kathleen Pinho / Holly Fulton6-4, 6-2
2024-02-10vs FYC - VansandtWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeralyn Forcier / Eleanor Mitchell vs Katharine Dozier / Cheryl Flanders4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-02-03vs Huguenot - JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesPolly Curole / Debbie Brooks vs Vandi Cole / Karen Miller4-6, 4-6
2024-01-27vs San Jose - HennessyWon 10
W#1 DoublesPolly Curole / Lezita Davis vs Carmel Buchanan / Jessica Mills7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-20vs Duval/Pinho/55&Over7.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesLezita Davis / Polly Curole vs Kathleen Pinho / Leah Carter3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Jeralyn Forcier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Polly Curole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Svetlana Mityul
published
3.18
Debbie Brooks
published 3.5
3.12
Kelli Bushman
published
3.09
Shari Shuman
published
2.75
Sandy Wedge
published
2.70
Margaret Radford
published
Eleanor Mitchell
published
Karen White
published
Lezita Davis
published
Moyin Lovelace
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Svetlana Mityul + Debbie Brooks224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeralyn Forcier
57W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
3.5
Polly Curole
112W–66L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Svetlana Mityul
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Debbie Brooks
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kelli Bushman
23W–29L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.12
Shari Shuman
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.09
Sandy Wedge
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
Margaret Radford
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Eleanor Mitchell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen White
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lezita Davis
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Moyin Lovelace
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.