Teams

Geethadevi

2025 · 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-11vs JoyceLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy Jackson / Lisa Douglas vs Laura Ketcham / Felice Hadden1-6, 4-6
2025-11-03Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Douglas / Tracy Jackson vs Stacy Sorrow / Laura Ketcham2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Im / Shirley Kile vs Lawanna Chang / Courtney Brunetz1-6, 1-6
2025-10-20vs JoyceLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Im / Shirley Kile vs Stacy Sorrow / Kennisha Cann3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBecky Quast / Lorraine Marks vs Lawanna Chang / Carla D'Addesi2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Jenni Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
3.56
Rekha Geethadevi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.54
Becky Quast
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 4
3.52
Suzanne Hanley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.48
Lorraine Marks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Linda Im
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Jewel Akpose
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Heather Tuttle
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Morgan
published 3.5
Tracy Jackson
published 3.5
3.10
Shirley Kile
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karo Hughes
published
Lisa Douglas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenni Johnson + Rekha Geethadevi5551% games+10.8% vs expected
Becky Quast + Heather Tuttle1646% games+5.0% vs expected
Jenni Johnson + Heather Tuttle134 matchesnot enough data
Rekha Geethadevi + Heather Tuttle224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Douglas + Tracy Jackson044 matchesnot enough data
Rekha Geethadevi + Jewel Akpose123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenni Johnson
25W–47L career · 11 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Rekha Geethadevi
18W–36L career · 10 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Becky Quast
13W–35L career · 18 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Suzanne Hanley
39W–33L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
Lorraine Marks
46W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Linda Im
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.42
Jewel Akpose
71W–78L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Heather Tuttle
43W–71L career · 21 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Elizabeth Morgan
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Tracy Jackson
14W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shirley Kile
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
Karo Hughes
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Douglas
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.