Teams

TCU HUBER

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 4.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.86 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-03vs TCU IRWINLost 02
L#2 DoublesSummer Richbourg / Cindy Lucio vs Diane Cauwels / Andrea Rhodes5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJeanette Johnson / Louise Otto vs Gayle Landers / Debbie McLendon3-6, 6-7
2025-03-14vs HV TONTIWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeredith Weckel / Paula Waterman vs Shawn Graef / Jackie Parades6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLouise Otto vs Cary Crawford0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKirti Kale / Kelly Wooley vs Shari Jones / Ashley Hickey6-1, 6-2
2025-02-28vs HTC BARRIESplit 11
W#2 DoublesPaula Waterman / Jan McKean vs Julie Evans / Jenna Xiong7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCindy Lucio / Alisha Wieland vs Kristie Shorey / Winnie Stimmel2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Cayla Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.85
Paula Waterman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Kirti Kale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alisha Wieland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Candy Shore
published 4
3.73
Teresa Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Gilda Tebeaux
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.70
Allyson Garrison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Leslie Eugenio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Christa Dobbs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Jan McKean
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.47
Kelly Wooley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Cynthia Cordial
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Summer Richbourg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Jennifer McNamara
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Timmie DAgostino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cindy Lucio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Summer McAmis
published
3.19
Susan Huber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Louise Otto
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Meredith Weckel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Summer Richbourg + Jan McKean10161% games+2.4% vs expected
Jan McKean + Susan Huber404 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Eugenio + Allyson Garrison404 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Cordial + Gilda Tebeaux303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cayla Jackson
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Paula Waterman
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Kirti Kale
22W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Alisha Wieland
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Candy Shore
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Robinson
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Gilda Tebeaux
34W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Allyson Garrison
13W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Leslie Eugenio
25W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Christa Dobbs
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Jan McKean
60W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Kelly Wooley
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Cynthia Cordial
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Summer Richbourg
57W–29L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
Jennifer McNamara
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
Timmie DAgostino
12W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Cindy Lucio
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Summer McAmis
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.20
Susan Huber
15W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Louise Otto
19W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Meredith Weckel
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.