Teams

Voglewede-Fisher/DV/Foothills

2025 Foothills Spring 18 & Over League · Women 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-30vs Harline/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJessie Dale / Amy Douglas vs Meredith Gladden / Helen Durrant2-6, 3-6
2025-04-09vs Bechtold/CCC/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesPhoenix Fisher / Erin Riordan vs Tammy Brindle / Laura Lever6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRo Babcock / Renner Murphy vs Beth Bechtold / Lori Wilson6-1, 6-3
2025-03-26vs Cashion/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJessie Dale / Rebecca Battista vs Blair Scheepers / Brannon Earles6-1, 6-3
2025-03-19vs Bechtold/CCC/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Riordan / Katelyn Voglewede vs Laura Lever / Beth Bechtold6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKyndy Boyle / Amy Douglas vs Lori Wilson / Lori Sadowski6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Erin Riordan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Renner Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Stacey Rex
published
2.60
Katelyn Voglewede
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Liz Mason
published
2.37
Rebecca Battista
published
2.30
Phoenix Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Jessie Dale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Kyndy Boyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ro Babcock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Battista + Phoenix Fisher224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Erin Riordan
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Renner Murphy
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
Stacey Rex
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Katelyn Voglewede
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Liz Mason
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Rebecca Battista
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.37
Phoenix Fisher
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Jessie Dale
19W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
Kyndy Boyle
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ro Babcock
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.