Teams

WDawson (Olde Providence)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Mon PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-28vs DJoo (Lifetime)Split 11
W#1 SinglesScott Hamer vs Kenneth Dorado6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTommy Cary / Jose Bermudez vs David Joo / Biju Nair2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-21vs TKasler (Matthews)Split 11
W#1 SinglesScott Hamer vs Jeff Johnson6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJerry Lee / Gerald Quattlebaum vs Randy Loman / Bryant Barnhardt1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-16vs MRyan (Carmel)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Zapata / Gerald Quattlebaum vs Steven DiVittorio / Andrew Halverstam7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-12vs JDichak (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesWally Dawson / Scott Hamer vs Daniel Kolepp / Adam Dawson7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGerald Quattlebaum / Jose Bermudez vs Bradley Holcman / Alberto Botero6-4, 7-5
2025-03-24vs THodge (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 SinglesScott Hamer vs Ganesh Pallem7-6, 6-2
2025-03-21vs KFranks (PPRSC)Won 10
W#1 SinglesScott Hamer vs Alven Weil7-5, 6-0
2025-03-17vs RTerrell (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesScott Hamer vs Anderson Silva6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesZachary Wagner / Tommy Cary vs Michael Reishman / Aaron Ligon6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesScott Hamer vs Jared Kleber6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Scott Hamer
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.43
Eric Jenkins
published
3.42
Jose Bermudez
published
3.40
Wally Dawson
published
3.38
Will Smith
published
3.37
Robert Salvucci
published
3.37
Gerald Quattlebaum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Zachary Wagner
published
3.13
Tommy Cary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Eric Chaniot
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Salvucci + Eric Jenkins4161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Scott Hamer
61W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Eric Jenkins
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jose Bermudez
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Wally Dawson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Will Smith
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
Robert Salvucci
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Gerald Quattlebaum
34W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Zachary Wagner
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Tommy Cary
26W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Eric Chaniot
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.