Teams

Eells & Callahan: Elmcrest

2025 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.21 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-26vs Smith & Schlabach: NDACWon 21
W#1 DoublesCait Klenk / Debra Callahan vs Brenda Wichhart / Bopha Chrea6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmy Worden / Elisha Horsfall vs Penny Raia / Jeniece Nott1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAshley Krogmann / Claire Callahan vs Kelly Bedeian / Carla Schmidt6-3, 6-4
2025-04-12vs Langdon & Wiley: SmithfieldSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKathy Keel Moeder / Christine McLaughlin vs Sally Wiley / Carol Renz1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Worden vs JENNIFER HEBERT1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Krogmann / Elisha Horsfall vs Rochelle Galbraith / Lois Blankenship6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJulie Kramer vs Joy Purdy7-6, 6-2
2025-03-08vs Langdon & Wiley: SmithfieldSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAmy Worden / Elisha Horsfall vs JENNIFER HEBERT / Andrea Norris1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCait Klenk vs Erin Langdon6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Kramer / Teresa Williams vs Caitlin Ward / Emily Flowergarden7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRachel Rigdon / Christine McLaughlin vs Lyla Schweiger / Kiley Graw6-3, 7-5
2025-03-01vs Smith & Schlabach: NDACWon 31
W#1 DoublesDebra Callahan / Kathy Keel Moeder vs Laura Frey Law / Brenda Wichhart6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCait Klenk vs Sarah Franje6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElisha Horsfall / Rachel Rigdon vs Sheila Schlabach / Bopha Chrea5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLindy Christensen vs Sonja Smith6-3, 6-3
2025-02-15vs Langdon & Wiley: SmithfieldLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindy Christensen / Amy Worden vs Erin Langdon / Sally Wiley3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCait Klenk vs JENNIFER HEBERT7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesElisha Horsfall / Teresa Williams vs Sandra Monahan / Lois Blankenship2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Cait Klenk
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Debra Callahan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Holly Ervin
published 3.5
2.83
Kathy Keel Moeder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Worden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Claire Callahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Elisha Horsfall
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.58
Julie Kramer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Christine McLaughlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lindy Christensen
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rachel Rigdon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Callahan + Cait Klenk303 matchesnot enough data
Amy Worden + Elisha Horsfall033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cait Klenk
17W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Debra Callahan
19W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Holly Ervin
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
Kathy Keel Moeder
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.83
3
Amy Worden
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Claire Callahan
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Elisha Horsfall
10W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
Julie Kramer
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Christine McLaughlin
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Lindy Christensen
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Rigdon
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.