Teams

DIAMOND HILLS 18AW4.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-16vs ROUND HILL CC 18AW4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesShirley Razdoroff / Tracie Cacciatore vs Kym Dawid / Debbie Alster2-6, 4-6
2023-06-04vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsy Lyons / Tracie Cacciatore vs Valerie Blanchard / Valjean Elander1-6, 0-6
2023-06-02vs WALNUT COUNTRY HOA 18AW4.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesNora Hayward / Tracie Cacciatore vs Judy Cummins / Latha Attari5-7, 4-6
2023-04-14vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesRuth Broach / Tracie Cacciatore vs Valerie Blanchard / Chamane Ifland4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Julia Porter
published
3.50
Michelle Dayco
published
3.43
Tracie Cacciatore
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Marie Calderon
published
3.20
Tina Lugo
published
3.17
Catherine Kutsuris
published 3.5
3.09
Kimberly Autajay
published
3.04
Priscilla Macksoud
published
2.89
Christina Dalton
published 3.5
Lyne Anne Morales
published
Nora Hayward
published
Ruth Broach
published
Shirley Razdoroff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Dalton + Shirley Razdoroff123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Kutsuris + Kimberly Autajay123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Porter
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.03
Michelle Dayco
21W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
Tracie Cacciatore
67W–83L career · 12 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Marie Calderon
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
Tina Lugo
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Catherine Kutsuris
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Kimberly Autajay
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.09
Priscilla Macksoud
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Christina Dalton
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.89
Lyne Anne Morales
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nora Hayward
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ruth Broach
0W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shirley Razdoroff
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.