Teams

Netherland

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over-SW · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-14vs FisherSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Miller / Diane Hay vs Nancy Fisher / Heather Watts6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRockie Netherland / Deanna Howington vs Leah Stewart / Christy Ard4-6, 3-6
2025-08-10vs FisherLost 01
L#2 DoublesDwana Wright / Sandy Winborne vs Staci Anding / Jennifer Townsend4-6, 1-6
2025-08-03vs FisherLost 01
L#2 DoublesDwana Wright / Deanna Howington vs Courtney Owens / Jennifer Townsend2-6, 1-6
2025-07-26vs FisherLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Miller / Deanna Howington vs Nancy Fisher / Paige Sullivan2-6, 0-6
2025-07-20vs FisherWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Easley / Diane Hay vs Nancy Fisher / Carolyn Stephens3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Netherland000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Joey Sessums
published
4.00
Emily Harper
published 4.5
3.93
Diane Hay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Ginny Dehart
published 4.5
3.17
Dwana Wright
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Rockie Netherland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Deanna Howington
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Sandy Winborne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joey Sessums + Ginny Dehart4252% games+6.3% vs expected
Deanna Howington + Dwana Wright2341% games−12.3% vs expected
Dwana Wright + Sandy Winborne3253% gamesnot enough data
Rockie Netherland + Dwana Wright224 matchesnot enough data
Ginny Dehart + Emily Harper213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joey Sessums
61W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.11
4.5
Emily Harper
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Diane Hay
17W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.93
4.5
Ginny Dehart
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.67
3.5
Dwana Wright
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Rockie Netherland
4W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Deanna Howington
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
Sandy Winborne
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.