Teams

Penn Pals

2023 Adult 65 and Over League · 6.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.07 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-17vs Happy Happy Hour!Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMartha Welch / Pam Isayama vs Cynthia U’i Milles / Elizabeth Maki6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoyce Trask / Maureen O'Guin vs Cyd Nishino / Charlotte Loo3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGwenette Higa / Sharon Cotton vs Iris Tomita / Alicia Mcclaverty3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-09-10vs KilaueaLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoyce Trask / Susie Jannuzzi vs Tatyana Stauffer / Bonnie Moy6-7, 1-2
W#2 DoublesTessa Travers / Pam Isayama vs Phyllis Tsukayama / Linda Levine4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarie-Christine Hothan / Wendy Jackson vs Barbara Furugen / Diane Yoshida2-6, 4-6
2023-09-03vs OC Kupuna Dream TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesMartha Welch / Pam Isayama vs Linda Lingle / Sarah Kistler5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen O'Guin / Susie Jannuzzi vs Linda Onomoto / Susan Weander4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarie-Christine Hothan / Stacy Ray vs Norma Hostelley / Martha Minson6-4, 6-3
2023-08-27vs High FivesLost 03
L#1 DoublesSue Davis / Stacy Ray vs Dorothy Umeda / Mary Kitsu0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGwenette Higa / Pam Isayama vs Rosalinda Cooper / KARIN OKINAGA4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Cotton / Tessa Travers vs Janice Mizusawa / Norene Ihori6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-13vs Happy Happy Hour!Lost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Nagamine / Joyce Trask vs Eileen Quinn / Iris Tomita6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPam Isayama / Tessa Travers vs Charlotte Loo / Cyd Nishino4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Gardetto / Wendy Jackson vs Ann Choy / Catherine Hiranaka6-7, 3-6
2023-08-06vs KilaueaWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaureen O'Guin / Ann Gardetto vs PJ Ellison / Tatyana Stauffer2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Nagamine / Joyce Trask vs Marge Bernice / Rae Tadaki6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWendy Jackson / Terry Beuret vs Jacqueline Chun / Miho May7-5, 6-4
2023-07-30vs OC Kupuna Dream TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusie Jannuzzi / Maureen O'Guin vs Sharon Lee / Norma Hostelley6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Nagamine / Joyce Trask vs Sarah Kistler / Veronica MacDonald6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGwenette Higa / Pam Isayama vs Susan Weander / Linda Onomoto6-4, 6-3
2023-07-23vs High FivesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoyce Trask / Ann Gardetto vs Dorothy Umeda / Gwen Okahara7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaureen O'Guin / Susie Jannuzzi vs Norene Ihori / Jocelyn Choy6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSue Davis / Terry Beuret vs Anne Hayashida / Janice Mizusawa6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Marie-Christine Hothan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Tessa Travers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Nancy Nagamine
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Ann Gardetto
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Gwenette Higa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Susie Jannuzzi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Maureen O'Guin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Joyce Trask
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Martha Welch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Pam Isayama
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Cotton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stacy Ray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Terry Beuret
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Nagamine + Marie-Christine Hothan7164% games+12.3% vs expected
Nancy Nagamine + Ann Gardetto8167% games+5.5% vs expected
Gwenette Higa + Ann Gardetto14655% games+3.7% vs expected
Maureen O'Guin + Stacy Ray3544% games+1.0% vs expected
Nancy Nagamine + Susie Jannuzzi3254% games−1.2% vs expected
Maureen O'Guin + Susie Jannuzzi7454% games−2.4% vs expected
Tessa Travers + Maureen O'Guin7748% gamesnot enough data
Gwenette Higa + Maureen O'Guin2638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Marie-Christine Hothan
42W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Tessa Travers
24W–81L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Nancy Nagamine
59W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Ann Gardetto
51W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Gwenette Higa
31W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Susie Jannuzzi
34W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Maureen O'Guin
64W–101L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66
Joyce Trask
10W–9L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Martha Welch
45W–33L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pam Isayama
10W–10L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Cotton
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacy Ray
15W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Terry Beuret
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Jackson
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.