Teams

Daves/Knoxville

2024 Combo 55 & Over- Knoxville · 6.5 Women Combo Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-09-15vs TN-Knoxville-Curtin/DailWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Campbell / Jenne MacCagli vs Gina Grubbs / Barbara McCarty6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJenny Liu / Leigh Cowden vs Kim Arrants / Kelly Carillon6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Warrick / Kathleen Sinclair vs Kathy Wuethrich / Amy Romano4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-08-11vs TN-Knoxville-Curtin/DailWon 21
W#1 DoublesEileen Webster / Jenny Liu vs Gina Grubbs / Barbara McCarty6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCaroline Sullivan / Marcia Bates vs Karen Dail / Kim Arrants3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Warrick / Kathleen Sinclair vs Amy Romano / Jana Dovgan6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.5 Women Combo Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Knoxville Worrell5111717163
2Daves/Knoxville2481022163
3TN-Knoxville-Curtin/Dail2481025190

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Laura Warrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Keck
published 3.5
Cyndy Atkins
published 3.5
3.15
Eileen Webster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Jenne MacCagli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Kristy Bruce
published
Bonney Daves
published 3
2.35
Marcia Bates
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jenny Liu
published
Kathleen Sinclair
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leigh Cowden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Warrick + Kathleen Sinclair5160% games+12.4% vs expected
Kathleen Sinclair + Amy Keck134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Warrick
55W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Amy Keck
9W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cyndy Atkins
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Eileen Webster
19W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.15
Jenne MacCagli
18W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
Kristy Bruce
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.93
3
Bonney Daves
1W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcia Bates
15W–38L career · 1 line in 2024
0%88%12%
2.35
Jenny Liu
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Sinclair
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leigh Cowden
17W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.