Teams

Racqueteers

2025 Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-22vs Lady Acers 2.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesEveline Shum vs Sarah Minter6-2, 6-3
2025-05-31vs Lady Acers 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesSara Perla / Susan Timoney vs Sabine Balzora / Dayesha Sims7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEveline Shum / Melanie Babb vs Wendy Wasserman / Myron James7-5, 5-3
2025-05-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesEveline Shum vs Stephanie Smith6-3, 6-4
2025-05-18vs LoVV 2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesEveline Shum / Sara Perla vs Stephanie Smith / Kashama McKenna6-1, 6-4
2025-05-10vs Lady Acers 2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesEveline Shum / Tiffany Ashton vs Sabine Balzora / Kelly Garry Burks6-3, 6-1
2025-04-27vs Lady Acers 2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesIngrid Ardjosoediro / Sara Perla vs Dana Willard / Wendy Wasserman7-5, 6-1
2025-04-19vs Lady Acers 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLourdes Sanchez / Sara Perla vs Brenda Barge / Kameko Jones6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesEveline Shum vs Kristel Walton6-0, 6-4
2025-04-05vs LoVV 2.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSara Perla / Theresa Henderson vs Kimberly Smith / Kamilah House3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Maria Miller
published
2.54
Eveline Shum
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.49
Tiffany Ashton
published
2.40
Lourdes Sanchez
published
2.38
Sara Perla
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.33
Ingrid Ardjosoediro
published 2.5
2.26
Susan Timoney
published
2.14
Theresa Henderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eveline Shum + Lourdes Sanchez134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Miller
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
0%21%79%
2.60
3
Eveline Shum
46W–87L career · 12 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
Tiffany Ashton
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Lourdes Sanchez
32W–45L career · no lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Sara Perla
35W–44L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.38
2.5
Ingrid Ardjosoediro
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.33
Susan Timoney
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
Theresa Henderson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.