Teams

Rally Girls 3.0 (40+)

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-07-27vs The ZingersWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrenda Poore / Yngrid Sierra vs Sally Barkley / Susan Houck6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLeigh Leslie / Ugur Erickson vs Doris Zingman / Susan Moody7-6, 6-4
2021-07-19vs Squirrels in Traffic (40+)Won 21
W#1 SinglesBrenda Poore vs Sung Cho6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca DeGioia / Traci Bidinger vs Jennifer Schied / Rosemary Harty7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichele Brill / Monica DeAgostino vs Anne Schaefer / Sejal Jani3-6, 1-6
2021-07-14vs Shepard's Flock (40+)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca DeGioia / Megan Wilhelm vs Katherine Battista / Maria Cristina Sanchez3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBrenda Poore vs Deborah Wright0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Reefe / Traci Bidinger vs Amy LaMoure / Christine Lee6-4, 7-6
2021-07-07vs Ladies of the Net 3.0 (40+)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesYngrid Sierra / STACEY WOLFE vs Alison Punsalan / Diane Ruggiero6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrenda Poore vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTeresa Reefe / Kathy Greene vs Amy Champion / Kimberly Sbarra6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-02vs Super Tennis Chicks (40+)Split 11
L#2 DoublesTeresa Reefe / Leigh Leslie vs Jin Lee / Amy Lamont5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrenda Poore / Yngrid Sierra vs Chanhee Ro / Margaret Sybert6-4, 6-4
2021-06-23vs Ladies of the Net 3.0 (40+)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrenda Poore / Yngrid Sierra vs Kristin Ostlie / Diane Ruggiero6-1, 6-4
2021-06-19vs You had me at Tennis (40+)Split 11
W#2 DoublesVeronica Best / Monica DeAgostino vs Jennifer Lippy / Andrea Smolen7-6, 3-3
L#3 DoublesMichele Brill / Leigh Leslie vs Rayane Clark / Angela Gardner4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2021-06-16Won 20
W#2 DoublesBrenda Poore / Yngrid Sierra vs Diana Chen / Marlo Newton6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Reefe / Veronica Best vs Julie Perks / Doris Zingman7-6, 6-1
2021-06-14vs Squirrels in Traffic (40+)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMegan Wilhelm / Rebecca DeGioia vs Cheryl Royce / Jennifer Schied6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathy Greene / Teresa Reefe vs Sejal Jani / Elise Steinberg6-2, 3-3
2021-06-06vs Shepard's Flock (40+)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBrenda Poore / Yngrid Sierra vs Linda Morris / Katherine Battista4-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca DeGioia / Traci Bidinger vs Amy LaMoure / Leslie MacFarlane7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-18vs Super Tennis Chicks (40+)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesBrenda Poore vs Amy Lamont1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Reefe / Traci Bidinger vs Chanhee Ro / Elizabeth Hatton1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMonica DeAgostino / Veronica Best vs Cathie Boarman / Maryanne Gruys4-6, 3-6
2021-05-13vs You had me at Tennis (40+)Won 20
W#2 DoublesVeronica Best / Monica DeAgostino vs Shannon Biggs / Debbie Wall5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrenda Poore / Leigh Leslie vs Rayane Clark / Tannan Hagyard7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Traci Bidinger
published
Amy Flynn
published 3.5
3.25
Brenda Poore
usually #1 Doubles 26%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.12
Yngrid Sierra
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Suzanne Rothwell
published
3.04
Teresa Reefe
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.00
Rebecca DeGioia
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.92
Kathy Greene
published
2.77
Monica DeAgostino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Leigh Leslie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yngrid Sierra + Brenda Poore101053% games+1.5% vs expected
Teresa Reefe + Monica DeAgostino72343% games−3.9% vs expected
Teresa Reefe + Rebecca DeGioia2342% gamesnot enough data
Donna Jones + Kathy Greene213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Traci Bidinger
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
3.30
3.5
Amy Flynn
no matches on record · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Brenda Poore
228W–199L career · 19 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Yngrid Sierra
165W–232L career · 12 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
Suzanne Rothwell
23W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Teresa Reefe
144W–118L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%37%63%
3.04
3.5
Rebecca DeGioia
124W–169L career · 7 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
Kathy Greene
31W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Monica DeAgostino
77W–123L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Leigh Leslie
109W–138L career · 10 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.