Teams

Broome-Cowen

2025 Hampton Roads Adult 55 & Over · Hampton Roads Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-14vs Kulas - Platinum AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Broome / Christine Cowen vs Janet Brashear / Beth Skolnick3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLiane Long / Tammy Willett vs Sandra Savino / Caroline Willcox6-3, 7-6
2025-08-07vs Kulas - Platinum AcesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJanet Marx / Joyce Howell vs Janet Brashear / Beth Skolnick7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTammy Willett / Christine Cowen vs Sandra Savino / Caroline Willcox6-2, 6-3
2025-07-31vs Kulas - Platinum AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTammy Willett / Diane Osborne Yates vs Beth Kulas / Norma Young7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Marx / Joyce Howell vs Cindy Crosslin / Cynthia Futrell6-0, 6-0
2025-07-24vs Kulas - Platinum AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesTammy Willett / Diane Osborne Yates vs Sandra Savino / Susan Nixon6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Marx / Marcela Anongos vs Norma Young / Cynthia Futrell6-0, 7-6
2025-07-17vs Kulas - Platinum AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLiane Long / Christine Cowen vs Beth Kulas / Beth Skolnick3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-06-26vs Kulas - Platinum AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesTammy Willett / Christine Cowen vs Janet Brashear / Beth Skolnick6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Clare Semler
published 4
3.44
Tammy Willett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Janet Marx
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Christine Cowen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Linda Sidone
published
3.19
Marcela Anongos
published
3.17
Diane Osborne Yates
published 3.5
2.86
Andrea Keller
published 3
Joyce Howell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Willett + Janet Marx6853% games−1.4% vs expected
Tammy Willett + Christine Cowen10553% games−6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clare Semler
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Tammy Willett
136W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Janet Marx
103W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Christine Cowen
107W–97L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Linda Sidone
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.21
Marcela Anongos
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Diane Osborne Yates
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Andrea Keller
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Joyce Howell
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.