Teams

LA - Supreme Court

2024 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 2.5

15 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for LA - Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Brooke Horowitz
published 3
2.67
Jenna Gambaro
published
2.66
Nicki Jaeger
published
2.59
Sarah Noonan
published
2.52
Alexandra Sann
published 3
2.50
Gina Petersen
published
2.46
Melissa Karz
published
2.44
Liz Rosman
published
2.38
Eunice Lakis
published
2.33
Joelle Boucai
published
2.33
Portia Furst
published
2.29
Hilary Angelo
published
2.26
2.11
Corinna Cherian
published 2.5
Kathy Daum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Rosman + Gina Petersen6254% games+4.0% vs expected
Raquelle de la Rocha + Portia Furst123 matchesnot enough data
Jenna Gambaro + Alexandra Sann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brooke Horowitz
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Jenna Gambaro
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Nicki Jaeger
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Sarah Noonan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.59
3
Alexandra Sann
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
2.52
Gina Petersen
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%51%49%
2.50
Melissa Karz
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.46
Liz Rosman
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%67%33%
2.44
Eunice Lakis
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%80%20%
2.38
Joelle Boucai
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.33
Portia Furst
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.33
Hilary Angelo
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.29
Raquelle de la Rocha
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Corinna Cherian
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Kathy Daum
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.