Teams

LCTA40/Keiper/CTC

USTA 40 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-06-01vs LCTA40/Hatmaker-Karika/Legend OaksLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Steele / Adam Smith vs Robert Karika / Tammy Karika1-6, 1-6
2023-05-08vs LCTA40/Holder/Pine ForestWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Smith / Yuliia McDonald vs Timothy Wiesnet / Dana Katz6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Janye Hines
published
3.54
3.50
Adam Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Will Scanlon
published
3.37
William Keiper
published
3.31
Kristin Steele
published
3.29
Yuliia McDonald
published
3.27
Denise Apple
published 3.5
Craig Modzelewski
published 3.5
James Holland
published 3.5
3.21
Charles Truluck
published 3.5
2.99
Shannon Smoak
published
2.97
Paul Callander
published
2.70
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Apple + Charles Truluck303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janye Hines
35W–29L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Barbara Silveston
44W–22L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Adam Smith
129W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Will Scanlon
82W–44L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
William Keiper
62W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Kristin Steele
75W–89L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Yuliia McDonald
58W–43L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Denise Apple
37W–37L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Craig Modzelewski
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
James Holland
28W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Charles Truluck
58W–34L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Shannon Smoak
9W–54L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
Paul Callander
22W–36L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Gretchen Sparacino
27W–40L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.