Teams

SGV TCC-Yarter-Claremont Club/SU4:30

2024 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesTrish Newlin / Shannon Sapp vs Deborah Babineau / Rumduol Vuong6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesTrish Newlin / Geneva Roe vs Christyne Burdett / Kasia Chmielewski0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShaheen Plunier / Grace Eleyae vs Stephanie Perry / Sharon Li3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTrish Newlin / Geneva Roe vs Regina Cheung / Alma Banuelos7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGrace Eleyae / Ellen Yarter vs Pamela Rosenberg / Linda Kroff6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGeneva Roe / Trish Newlin vs Lorna Kim / Irina Abadzheva7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEllen Yarter / Laurel Eriksen vs Holly Wolfle Hall / Joanne Kim7-6, 6-3
2024-09-29vs SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arroyo High-SA12Split 11
L#1 DoublesAydee Martinez / Trish Newlin vs Angelica Ramos / VICKY TRINH2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEllen Yarter / Shannon Sapp vs Lana Dalley / Keiko Jun3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGrace Eleyae / Laurel Eriksen vs Gia Bao Le / Maria Rose6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Shannon Sapp
published
3.89
Jami Johnson
published 4
3.85
Silvia Vich
published
3.66
Michelle Morgan
published
3.65
Grace Eleyae
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Geneva Roe
published 4
3.59
Trish Newlin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Aydee Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Sheila Purdy
published
3.35
Cris Stark
published 4
3.27
Ellen Yarter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Shaheen Plunier
published
Laurel Eriksen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aydee Martinez + Trish Newlin51241% games−7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Sapp
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Jami Johnson
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.89
Silvia Vich
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
Michelle Morgan
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Grace Eleyae
126W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Geneva Roe
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Trish Newlin
55W–112L career · 5 lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.59
4
Aydee Martinez
81W–78L career · 1 line in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
Sheila Purdy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
4
Cris Stark
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Ellen Yarter
82W–127L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Shaheen Plunier
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Laurel Eriksen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.