Teams

Racquet Club-Nini

2022 SUMMER Combo Women · Summer 8.5W Combo

15 players · average NTRP 4.14 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-04vs Olympic-CarterLost 12
L#1 DoublesSamantha Shea / Ana Diaz vs Deidra Engle / Julie Smith Henson6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Daniels / Alexandra Lerg vs Tess Tannehill / My Linh Li6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Beasecker / Natalie Zimberg vs Kelsey Jenkins / Katherine Eisnaugle1-6, 5-7
2022-07-21vs Olympic-CarterWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachel Heinz / Natalie Zimberg vs My Linh Li / Jessica Bell6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAileen McGhee / Amy Daniels vs Kathleen Kinnard / Cindy Benedict6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMary Beasecker / Bethany Billi vs Julia Huffman / Lori Carter4-6, 0-6
2022-07-14vs Olympic-CarterWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachel Heinz / Natalie Zimberg vs Chelsey Vascura / Julie Smith Henson7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAna Diaz / Samantha Shea vs Cindy Benedict / Kathleen Kinnard6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAileen McGhee / Amy Daniels vs Julia Huffman / Lori Carter6-2, 6-2
2022-06-23vs Olympic-CarterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Daniels / Adrienne Keves vs Deidra Engle / Julie Smith Henson0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Hatcher / Alexandra Lerg vs Katherine Eisnaugle / Lindsey Boyer6-4, 6-3
2022-06-02vs Olympic-CarterLost 03
L#1 DoublesSamantha Shea / Ana Diaz vs Chelsey Vascura / Tess Tannehill2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Daniels / Adrienne Keves vs Deidra Engle / Lindsey Boyer2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichele Thompson / Bethany Billi vs Julia Huffman / Kelsey Jenkins2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer 8.5W Combo have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Amy Daniels
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.16
Mary Beasecker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Natalie Zimberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Alexandra Lerg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Michele Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Samantha Shea
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Aileen McGhee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Eileen Dinnin
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Ana Diaz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Bethany Billi
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.65
Adrienne Keves
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Julie Nini
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Wiltberger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rachel Heinz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Hatcher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Diaz + Samantha Shea27661% games+7.6% vs expected
Amy Daniels + Michele Thompson9561% games+5.9% vs expected
Amy Daniels + Alexandra Lerg6256% games+4.0% vs expected
Natalie Zimberg + Michele Thompson4251% games+3.5% vs expected
Bethany Billi + Eileen Dinnin7356% games+3.0% vs expected
Mary Beasecker + Aileen McGhee17362% games+2.0% vs expected
Rachel Heinz + Natalie Zimberg5546% games−0.9% vs expected
Adrienne Keves + Bethany Billi321754% games−2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Daniels
76W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
Mary Beasecker
156W–69L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
4.16
Natalie Zimberg
29W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Alexandra Lerg
68W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.09
Michele Thompson
110W–100L career · 1 line in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
Samantha Shea
50W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Aileen McGhee
83W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Eileen Dinnin
82W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Ana Diaz
45W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Bethany Billi
209W–110L career · 7 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Adrienne Keves
89W–90L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Julie Nini
53W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Julie Wiltberger
64W–78L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Heinz
31W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Hatcher
118W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.