Teams

Willow Oaks - Johnson 8.0

2025 Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday 8.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-02Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCatherine Fallin / Kimberly Giancaspro vs Mary Miller / Bonnie Way3-6, 2-6
2025-05-19vs Belmont - Colgin 8.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Giancaspro / Teresa Lancaster vs Anne Murray / Therese Jones6-2, 7-6
2025-05-12vs CCV Long 8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Giancaspro / Catherine Fallin vs Pam Sweeney / Susan Trigg1-6, 1-6
2025-05-05vs MTC Reynolds 8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNan Brichta / Kimberly Giancaspro vs Diana Duddy / Nancy Pitts4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Fallin / Teresa Lancaster vs Joy Lareau / Maureen McGrath3-6, 1-6
2025-04-28vs Belmont - Colgin 8.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesCatherine Fallin / Teresa Lancaster vs Jane Colgin / Therese Jones6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKatherine Berry / Kimberly Giancaspro vs Nancy Hayes / Karen Zachary4-6, 4-6
2025-04-21vs CCV Long 8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Giancaspro / Teresa Lancaster vs Margaret Corwin / Betsy Richardson0-6, 5-7
2025-04-16vs Belmont - Colgin 8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesCatherine Fallin / Kimberly Giancaspro vs Jane Riddle / Lee Moore1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-14vs MTC Reynolds 8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Fallin / Annie H Johnson vs Diana Duddy / Cindy Eramian4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Lancaster / Kimberly Giancaspro vs Maureen McGrath / Susan Nothnagle6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Annie H Johnson
published 3.5
3.29
Kimberly Giancaspro
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.26
Catherine Fallin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.24
Teresa Lancaster
published
3.15
Kelly Gregory
published
Lee Turlington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Giancaspro + Annie H Johnson2347% games+4.9% vs expected
Kimberly Giancaspro + Catherine Fallin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Annie H Johnson
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Kimberly Giancaspro
89W–100L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Catherine Fallin
125W–165L career · 10 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Teresa Lancaster
7W–23L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Kelly Gregory
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Lee Turlington
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.