Teams

PH RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-05-27vs PH BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Picha / Kristin Overton vs Christy Brant / Nhung Van6-3, 6-2
2021-05-23vs KC BLACKLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Picha / Dyanne Isaak vs Teresa Granath / Dianne Sandy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-06vs LEBTC GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Picha / Darci Cruickshank vs Susana Wanken / Christina Schwartz6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2021-04-29vs KC GOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Picha / Dyanne Isaak vs Joelle Arne / Sara VanHook4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Morgan Pope
published
Darci Cruickshank
published 3.5
3.13
Julie Picha
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Kimberly Creedon
published
2.97
Marla Schroeder
published
Alison Dosher
published 3
Angie Vigil
published
Dyanne Isaak
published
Jennifer Rosely
published
Kristin Overton
published
Monica Morton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Picha + Kristin Overton2451% games+5.6% vs expected
Julie Picha + Alison Dosher3449% games+1.5% vs expected
Kimberly Creedon + Julie Picha61246% games−10.4% vs expected
Monica Morton + Morgan Pope314 matchesnot enough data
Monica Morton + Alison Dosher224 matchesnot enough data
Darci Cruickshank + Alison Dosher044 matchesnot enough data
Dyanne Isaak + Darci Cruickshank123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Morgan Pope
26W–14L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Darci Cruickshank
10W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Julie Picha
84W–97L career · 4 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Kimberly Creedon
14W–22L career · no lines in 2021
28%71%<1%
3.07
Marla Schroeder
44W–50L career · no lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Alison Dosher
14W–38L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Angie Vigil
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Dyanne Isaak
5W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Rosely
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristin Overton
64W–34L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Monica Morton
19W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.