Teams

Nagy, Kyle

2026 HOA Adult Low Tri-Level 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · Men Low Tri Level 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-27vs Burgess, RandyLost 12
L#1 DoublesOswaldo Bravo / Daniel Pena vs Kelcei Glasgow / Eric True4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMatt Moore / Jim Mcmullen vs Sungjoon Park / Addisen Reboulet7-6, 4-4
L#3 DoublesBret Barnhart / Terry Shaffer vs Scott Doherty / Aaron Locke4-6, 3-6
2026-08-20vs Pattabiraman, KarthickWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrandon Bohning / Oswaldo Bravo vs Joseph Bui / Jay Caple6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Moore / Jim Mcmullen vs Ethan Bowman / Evan Langdon6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohnny Ream / Terry Shaffer vs Will Griggs / Tucker Wilson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-13vs Woodard, AveryWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Pena / Andrew Reed vs Michael Schmitz / Christopher Wiedmeyer5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrandon Bohning / Ian Loftus vs Michael Klaus / Grant Allen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTerry Shaffer / Jason Balk vs Charles Thomas / Michael Curley6-1, 6-2
2026-08-06vs Burgess, RandyLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrad Cook / Daniel Pena vs Alexander True / Eric True5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJim Mcmullen / Andrew Plungkhen vs Randy Burgess / Addisen Reboulet4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJason Balk / Jeff Pirkey vs Mark Mathy / John Owens6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-03vs Pattabiraman, KarthickLost 03
L#1 DoublesBret Barnhart / Jason Balk vs Will Griggs / Derek Tatum7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKyle Nagy / Andrew Plungkhen vs Brett Saunders / Evan Langdon4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrad Cook / Andrew Reed vs Ram Gottapu / Joseph Bui6-7, 2-6
2026-07-23vs Woodard, AveryWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Pena / Andrew Reed vs Christopher Wiedmeyer / Zachary Schmitz6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMatt Moore / Ian Loftus vs Avery Woodard / Michael Klaus0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTerry Shaffer / Jeff Pirkey vs Charles Thomas / Dakota Cordel6-2, 6-3
2026-07-16vs Burgess, RandyLost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Balk / Johnny Ream vs Mark Mathy / Joseph Wigg3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBrandon Bohning / Andrew Plungkhen vs Randy Burgess / Addisen Reboulet3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesOswaldo Bravo / Brad Cook vs Scott Ernst / Joel Fagin4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Men Low Tri Level 3.0, 3.5, 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Burgess, Randy501239127
2Pattabiraman, Karthick238719148
3Nagy, Kyle2351022151
4Woodard, Avery1451024150

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniel Pena
published 4
3.70
Brad Cook
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Andrew Reed
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Oswaldo Bravo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Matt Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Brandon Bohning
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Andrew Plungkhen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Jim Mcmullen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Ian Loftus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Kyle Nagy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Jason Balk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Jeff Pirkey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Terry Shaffer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Bret Barnhart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Johnny Ream
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Plungkhen + Brandon Bohning1538% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Reed + Brad Cook314 matchesnot enough data
Brad Cook + Matt Moore404 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Nagy + Brandon Bohning314 matchesnot enough data
Terry Shaffer + Johnny Ream213 matchesnot enough data
Terry Shaffer + Jason Balk303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Pena
5W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Brad Cook
40W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Andrew Reed
30W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Oswaldo Bravo
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Matt Moore
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3.5
Brandon Bohning
35W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Andrew Plungkhen
33W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Jim Mcmullen
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Ian Loftus
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Kyle Nagy
36W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Jason Balk
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
2.94
Jeff Pirkey
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Terry Shaffer
19W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Bret Barnhart
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Johnny Ream
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.