Teams

LA - Ace Dragon

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-08vs LA - Black PearlWon 31
W#1 DoublesYorland Tellez / Adam Winkler vs ZACH FISHBAIN / Gonzalo Montenegro6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDara Oum vs Peter Kwon4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGreg Abramson / Larry Lawrence vs Duc Le / Jeff Lorch3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesScott Peyton / Kevin Tan vs Roy Jenkins / Nigel Lizaranzu6-3, 6-3
2025-02-01vs LA - Good Friends SM4Won 40
W#1 DoublesGreg Abramson / KJ Park vs Won Cho / Timothy Chun3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDara Oum vs Jason Nam7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLarry Lawrence / Kevin Tan vs SEUNG KIM / Jisoo Han6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesYorland Tellez / Adam Winkler vs John Byeon / Michael Pak6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Kevin Tan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.04
Yorland Tellez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Jae Kang
published
3.83
Dara Oum
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.80
Adam Winkler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Greg Abramson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Daniel Eisenberg
published 4
3.71
Larry Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Douglas Jaques
published
Joe Halbardier
published
KJ Park
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Peyton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jae Kang + Yorland Tellez9067% games+8.4% vs expected
Adam Winkler + Yorland Tellez6068% games+2.6% vs expected
Adam Winkler + Greg Abramson314 matchesnot enough data
Larry Lawrence + Greg Abramson224 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Jaques + Greg Abramson303 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Tan + Greg Abramson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Tan
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.04
Yorland Tellez
31W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.04
Jae Kang
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Dara Oum
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Adam Winkler
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Greg Abramson
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Daniel Eisenberg
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Larry Lawrence
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Douglas Jaques
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Joe Halbardier
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
KJ Park
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Scott Peyton
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.