Teams

EW-CBRC-Mehlenbacher

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-30vs EW-WRAC-Van HoutenWon 30
W#1 DoublesLarry Bagaasen / Huijuan Zhang vs James Roberts / Donna Roberts4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Hilmes / Patty Aoyama vs David Kelly / Keri Marino6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEvan Mehlenbacher / Sheila Coles vs Lance Lorrain / Cindy Bowen-Lorrain6-2, 6-2
2024-06-29vs EW-WRAC-Van HoutenWon 21
L#1 DoublesEvan Mehlenbacher / Sheila Coles vs James Roberts / Donna Roberts1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Hilmes / Patty Aoyama vs Mark Gray / Bo Xiao7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJames Chandler / Candee Foss vs Roger van Houten / Keri Marino6-3, 6-4
2024-06-29vs EW-WRAC-Van HoutenLost 12
W#1 DoublesLarry Bagaasen / Patty Aoyama vs Mark Gray / Cindy Bowen-Lorrain6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Hilmes / Sheila Coles vs David Kelly / Bo Xiao5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Chandler / Candee Foss vs James Roberts / Donna Roberts3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-CBRC-Mehlenbacher2163878
2EW-WRAC-Van Houten12361494

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Evan Mehlenbacher
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.90
John Hilmes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Larry Bagaasen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Candee Foss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
James Chandler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Patty Aoyama
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Huijuan Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sheila Coles
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Chandler + Candee Foss6453% games−3.7% vs expected
Evan Mehlenbacher + Sheila Coles121052% gamesnot enough data
Patty Aoyama + John Hilmes3351% gamesnot enough data
Huijuan Zhang + Larry Bagaasen3261% gamesnot enough data
Huijuan Zhang + John Hilmes404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Evan Mehlenbacher
62W–83L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
3
John Hilmes
66W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Larry Bagaasen
30W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Candee Foss
27W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
James Chandler
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Patty Aoyama
34W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.53
Huijuan Zhang
19W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheila Coles
23W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.