Teams

AMehrizi (OPRC)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-04vs AShea (Carmel)Won 40
W#1 DoublesAnne Krug / Caroleen Towery vs Mary Davis / Lisa Beebe6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesShannon Casey vs PerMar Olin6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStacey Lee / Nannette Markham vs Casey Fuller / Geralyn McCourt6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSurabhi Chopra / Angie Mehrizi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-02vs AEberhardt/SLind (Bridgehampton)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesSurabhi Chopra / Nannette Markham vs Shannon Lind / Nicole Paterson0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesHeather Dineen vs Amy Eberhardt3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAngie Mehrizi / Amber Filingeri vs Cory Mondshane / Ann Marie Selee4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Snead / Tiffany Eby vs Stacy Doline / Carol Scott2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-21vs KWebster (Ballantyne Country Club)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesAnne Krug / Stacey Lee vs Sheri Newman / Kristin Webster1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAmber Filingeri vs Nancy Scholz5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTiffany Eby / Caroleen Towery vs Tracy Reitz / Andrea Sappenfield5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSurabhi Chopra / Suzanne Adams vs Linda Shelton / Margit Etzel6-1, 6-3
2025-04-04vs BTobia (Brookhaven)Won 31
W#1 DoublesSurabhi Chopra / Caroleen Towery vs Jenny Helms / Victoria Morris6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAngie Mehrizi vs Tabitha Hanson7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Snead / Tiffany Eby vs Brenda Tobia / Giuliana Bolanos0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hanly / Heather Dineen vs Shawna Lauer / Laura Hunter6-2, 6-2
2025-03-28vs LHatfield (Palisades)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Krug / Angie Mehrizi vs Amy MacDonnell / Cindy Harty7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hanly / Surabhi Chopra vs Laura Russ / Patti Addington4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Dineen / Amy Snead vs Freida Haselden / Terri Hansford4-6, 3-6
2025-03-21vs CMurphy (Carmel)Won 31
W#1 DoublesTiffany Eby / Caroleen Towery vs Emily Hodge / Lindsay Schall7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesShannon Casey vs Emily Baker6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Snead / Heather Dineen vs Brittany Russell / Christina Murphy3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Krug / Amber Filingeri vs Deb Childress / Lauren Hansen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-14vs NDenton (Life Time)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAmber Filingeri / Angie Mehrizi vs Kelly Farfour / Lou Rives6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Adams / Jennifer Hanly vs Kristen FitzGerald / Ashley Logan1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTiffany Eby / Caroleen Towery vs Ursula Bonar / Yesol Kwon3-6, 4-6
2025-03-07vs TMacuga/Graham (Park Crossing)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMelinda van Hecke / Nannette Markham vs Kathryn Ford / Andrea Kummer6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCaroleen Towery / Suzanne Adams vs Jocelyn Zuehlke / Jennifer Harling3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSurabhi Chopra / Heather Dineen vs Kim Giusti / Michelle Rideout3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesAnne Krug / Melinda van Hecke vs Starr Stroud / Holly Foley2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShannon Casey vs Lauren Stout6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAngie Mehrizi / Amber Filingeri vs Annie Spanjers / Judy Kilduff7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Snead / Jennifer Hanly vs Emily Bass / Andrea Johnson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings29 teams · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TMagee/LDiman (Carmel)9032413177
2SChandler/NKoesel (Raintree)8027516224
3PReimann (Matthews)8129721266
4THyso (Life Time)7227921205
5JKilduff/VGray (Sardis Swim & Racquet)7227924261
6JWoodruff/EPickens (CSRC)72261025261
7SPurdy (Mountainbrook)72241229272
8JKing/TMarcel (Park Road)72231330262
9VTolson/KPetras (Firethorne)62191334284
10CLogar/RRiechelmann (WSRC)53171534271
11MRawlings/DdeArmas (Firethorne)54221434310
12ATrexler/KNelson (Alexander Street)54191738310
13AMehrizi (OPRC)54201639311
14KLee/SChandra (CTNC)54181840326
15AEberhardt/SLind (Bridgehampton)54181842327
16KWebster (Ballantyne Country Club)54191743338
17JSmith (Raintree)44171533276
18SHerndon/SStaley (WSRC)44171534270
19TMacuga/Graham (Park Crossing)45211534291
20LHatfield (Palisades)45112551366
21TInga (Lifetime)35102247321
22CMurphy (Carmel)36171943329
23CAcevedo (Springfield)36162044314
24NDenton (Life Time)36152145296
25SAgrawal (Blakeney)3682859380
26YSmith (Mason Wallace)26131942296
27LBlack/NWeil (PPRSC)27132349340
28AShea (Carmel)2792757387
29EO'Brien/LHolman (WSRC)1863062405

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Melinda van Hecke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Amber Filingeri
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Shannon Casey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.75
Jennifer Hanly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Angie Mehrizi
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Casey Beck
published 3
2.66
Nannette Markham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Surabhi Chopra
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Caroleen Towery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Anne Krug
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.47
Heather Dineen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.46
Tiffany Eby
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.41
Amy Snead
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Mehrizi + Amber Filingeri5165% games+18.7% vs expected
Caroleen Towery + Tiffany Eby5355% games+3.3% vs expected
Anne Krug + Angie Mehrizi41240% games−7.5% vs expected
Anne Krug + Caroleen Towery4356% gamesnot enough data
Nannette Markham + Angie Mehrizi224 matchesnot enough data
Anne Krug + Amber Filingeri303 matchesnot enough data
Anne Krug + Melinda van Hecke213 matchesnot enough data
Caroleen Towery + Surabhi Chopra213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melinda van Hecke
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Amber Filingeri
37W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Shannon Casey
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Jennifer Hanly
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Angie Mehrizi
44W–63L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Casey Beck
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Nannette Markham
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66
Surabhi Chopra
17W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Caroleen Towery
51W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Anne Krug
25W–49L career · 10 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
2.5
Heather Dineen
9W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.47
Tiffany Eby
8W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Amy Snead
8W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.