Teams

Parker/JB/JCC

2025 Mixed 18 & Over 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 · 2.5 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-28vs JChandler/JB/APLost 12
L#1 DoublesChloe McFarlane / Landon Mcfadden vs Kristen Franyutti / Danny Helms2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Parker / John Gay vs Jett Jones / Brittany McFadden3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCari Dunham / Larry Abbott vs Christopher Ryen / Jamie Chandler2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-30vs Sullins-Dallas/JB/APSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCari Dunham / Larry Abbott vs Emily Aycock / Austin Aycock6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChloe McFarlane / Mark Thompson vs Hannah Chambers / Tyler Peters1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-18vs Wildy-Ishamel/JB/RPWon 21
L#1 DoublesCari Dunham / Andrew Dunham vs Lydia Thornton / Wes Thornton6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Kelly / Joe Cook vs Kristie Becker / Bill Becker6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChloe McFarlane / Mark Thompson vs Jeanne Bailey / Joseph Bailey6-1, 6-0
2025-06-16vs Wildy-Ishamel/JB/RPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLauren Parker / John Gay vs Lydia Thornton / Wes Thornton3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAarika Thompson / Larry Abbott vs Alyssa Ishmael / Randell Ishmael6-2, 6-3
2025-05-29vs McGee/JB/3OaksLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoe Cook / Blair Cook vs Bobbi Hydrick / Patrick Patterson0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMark Thompson / Aarika Thompson vs Mallorie Hughes / Jeremy Taggart7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Gay / Lauren Parker vs John Ross / Meredith Ross1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
John Gay
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Aarika Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Cari Dunham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.42
Joe Cook
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.36
Chloe McFarlane
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.29
Larry Abbott
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Hannah McFadden
published
Andrew Dunham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Gay
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.00
3
Aarika Thompson
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cari Dunham
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Joe Cook
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.42
2.5
Chloe McFarlane
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
Larry Abbott
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Hannah McFadden
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Andrew Dunham
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.