Teams

Over Fifty Five Guys 55+

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over Day · Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-02vs SilbermanWade 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesMahmood Solaiman / Jaspreet Singh vs Raymond Barry / Michael Chotiner6-0, 6-3
2022-07-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesMahmood Solaiman / Mark Greenlee vs Michael Birger / Richard Boales6-3, 6-2
2022-07-22vs SilbermanWade 55+Won 20
W#2 DoublesJim Hannan / Mark Rossi vs John Wade / Chris Wertman6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTodd Snyder / Mahmood Solaiman vs Raymond Barry / Michael Chotiner6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-14vs Carroll 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesMark Greenlee / Richard McKeon vs Michael Grover / Celso Gutierrez7-5, 6-4
2022-07-10vs SilbermanWade 55+Won 20
W#2 DoublesJim Hannan / Mark Greenlee vs Chris Wertman / Joe MacHovec6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRichard McKeon / Mahmood Solaiman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-24Won 20
W#2 DoublesRichard McKeon / Mark Rossi vs Michael Birger / Michael Grover6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJaspreet Singh / Mahmood Solaiman vs James Carroll / John Hisnanick6-1, 6-2
2022-06-14vs SilbermanWade 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesMahmood Solaiman / Rick Ball vs Steve Gaudio / Michael Chotiner6-2, 6-0
2022-06-04vs Carroll 55+Won 20
W#2 DoublesMark Greenlee / Jim Hannan vs Michael Binder / James Carroll6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMahmood Solaiman / Richard McKeon vs Michael Birger / Fred Shaw6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Jim Hannan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Rick Ball
published
2.90
Jeffrey Soriano
published
2.86
Mark Greenlee
published
2.76
Mark Rossi
published
2.62
Richard McKeon
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.56
Mahmood Solaiman
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Hannan + Richard McKeon10459% games+5.4% vs expected
Mahmood Solaiman + Richard McKeon6357% gamesnot enough data
Mark Greenlee + Jim Hannan123 matchesnot enough data
Jim Hannan + Mahmood Solaiman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jim Hannan
133W–127L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.05
Rick Ball
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
Jeffrey Soriano
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
Mark Greenlee
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
Mark Rossi
13W–33L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Richard McKeon
235W–409L career · 7 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Mahmood Solaiman
80W–158L career · 7 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.