Teams

RVW - Bell

2026 CSRATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Summer '26 · Mixed 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-12vs CCRC - BatraLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaleb Bell / Micaela Bell vs Bajio Antony / Karen Fralick4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLyndi Baldy / Michael Baldy vs Gagan Batra / Preeti Batra1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeremy Lacey / Amanda Mellon vs Anna Crane / Scott Kahler1-6, 1-6
2026-06-29vs Odell Weeks - DegnanLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaleb Bell / Jessica Weir vs Matthew Wilson / Lori Pope2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Bell / Denise Vaughn vs Rob Bruno / Carolyn McCarthy6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNathan Morgan / Laura Weir vs Kevin Tam / Brooke Homan5-7, 2-6
2026-06-15vs NTC - SpragueLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica Weir / Nathan Morgan vs Jaye Cohen / Halley Badger3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Weir / Caleb Bell vs Ashley Pracht / Trevor Adkins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Mellon / Jeremy Lacey vs Lee Sprague / Leslie Sprague0-6, 4-6
2026-06-08vs CCRC - Nikhil (MXD 3.5)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Vaughn / Nathan Morgan vs Lauren Hutto / Eddie Miranda0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKyle Perry / Tiffany Padgett vs Eileen Zayas Baez / Nikhil Narendran1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Mellon / Jeremy Lacey vs Sammy Crawford / Amy Forsha2-6, 2-6
2026-05-18vs Odell Weeks - DegnanLost 12
W#1 DoublesCaleb Bell / Jessica Weir vs David Petersen / Alyssa Degnan6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKyle Perry / Laura Weir vs Matthew Wilson / Lori Pope6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Bell / Tiffany Padgett vs Benjamin Proctor / Nichol Gregory2-6, 3-6
2026-05-11vs CCRC - BatraWon 21
W#1 DoublesMicaela Bell / David Bell vs Scott Kahler / Laurel Landon6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLaura Weir / Caleb Bell vs Scott Stevenson / Karen Fralick6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTiffany Padgett / Nathan Morgan vs Gagan Batra / Preeti Batra3-6, 1-6
2026-05-04vs NTC - SpragueLost 12
L#1 DoublesNathan Morgan / Jessica Weir vs Mary Senn / Daniel Huang6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCaleb Bell / Laura Weir vs Trevor Adkins / Mallory Bodie3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLyndi Baldy / Michael Baldy vs Leslie Sprague / MacKenize Morris6-4, 6-4
2026-04-27vs CCRC - Nikhil (MXD 3.5)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Vaughn / Caleb Bell vs Tucker Braddy / Jessica Litavec6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Weir / Nathan Morgan vs Eddie Miranda / Lisa Furlong4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKyle Perry / Tiffany Padgett vs Tom Shimp / Lauren Hutto1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Mixed 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCRC - Nikhil (MXD 3.5)7119513145
2Odell Weeks - Degnan6215920186
3CCRC - Batra35111327211
4NTC - Sprague3591535257
5RVW - Bell1761838251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Caleb Bell
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.26
Michael Baldy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Denise Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Bert Lacey
published 3.5
3.19
Nathan Morgan
published
3.15
Laura Weir
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.06
Jessica Weir
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.01
Jeremy Lacey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Tiffany Padgett
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Lyndi Baldy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Amanda Mellon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Micaela Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Lacey + Amanda Mellon0624% games−16.8% vs expected
Caleb Bell + Laura Weir2351% gamesnot enough data
Michael Baldy + Lyndi Baldy224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Baldy + Jeremy Lacey044 matchesnot enough data
Caleb Bell + Jessica Weir134 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Padgett + Denise Vaughn033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caleb Bell
9W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Michael Baldy
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Denise Vaughn
21W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Bert Lacey
3W–12L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Nathan Morgan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Laura Weir
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.15
Jessica Weir
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jeremy Lacey
0W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Tiffany Padgett
7W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
Lyndi Baldy
18W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Amanda Mellon
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Micaela Bell
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.