Teams

Miami/TeamForman/18&over 2.5W

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - Spring - Day · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.92 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-04-23vs Lopez (Dante Fascell)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Hernandez / Elizabeta Dimkova vs Gigi Rojas / Antonieta Racho3-6, 3-6
2025-04-16vs The Pink FlamingosWon 20
W#1 DoublesVeronica Montanez / Alexandra Navas vs Mayes Weiser / Jennifer Lee6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Curi / Michelle Chica vs Patricia Trebbau / Cristina Delvat6-3, 4-2
2025-04-09vs Andrade (Riviera Country Club)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKatherine Hernandez / Elizabeta Dimkova vs Victoria Hucks / Daniela Erana6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPamela Petry Martinez / Alexandra Navas vs Valentina Silva / Andria Dickinson6-4, 6-1
2025-04-02vs Ugarte (Schoolyard Tennis)Won 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeta Dimkova / Katherine Hernandez vs Aya Olmedillo / Maria Espinoza6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Curi / Michelle Chica vs Chanel Valdes / Victoria Stern7-5, 6-3
2025-03-19vs Miami MermaidsWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeta Dimkova / Katherine Hernandez vs Magdalen Bush / Brenda Fannon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLouise Starr / Laura Curi vs Lydia Puente / Blanca Cabrera6-2, 6-1
2025-03-12vs DETA Continental ParkWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeta Dimkova / Katherine Hernandez vs Maria del Carmen Caballero / Isabel CRUZ7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVeronica Montanez / Alexandra Navas vs Adriana Lima / Gisleine Silveira6-2, 6-3
2025-02-26vs Lopez (Dante Fascell)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeta Dimkova / Katherine Hernandez vs Larra Call Waldmann / Vanessa Patience2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-19vs The Pink FlamingosWon 20
W#1 DoublesLouise Starr / Alexandra Navas vs Demet Tekin / Jane de Cardenas6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLaura Curi / Agnes Depinska vs Annie Unanue / Cristina Delvat6-3, 6-0
2025-02-12vs Andrade (Riviera Country Club)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeta Dimkova / Veronica Montanez vs Elizabeth Brown / Daniela Erana2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-05vs Ugarte (Schoolyard Tennis)Won 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeta Dimkova / Katherine Hernandez vs Irene Simkovitz / Valeria Macias-Flores7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Curi / Elena Bluntzer vs Aya Olmedillo / Prina Bhatia6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-01-29vs Miami MermaidsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Chica / Alexandra Navas vs Justine Avoudikpon / Kristy De La Sierra1-6, 1-6
2025-01-22vs DETA Continental ParkWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeta Dimkova / Michelle Chica vs Sandra Sainz / Priscila Querasian6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Curi / Katherine Hernandez vs Laura Micali / Andrea Eboli6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Alicia lopez
published 3
3.07
Alexandra Navas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.85
Louise Starr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Katherine Hernandez
published
2.63
2.60
Laura Curi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.53
Elizabeta Dimkova
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #2 Singles 9% · published 3
2.42
Gabriela Boza
published
2.38
Elena Bluntzer
published
2.38
Michelle Chica
published
2.21
Miriam Fabregas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Arianne Llana
published
Jane Forman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Hernandez + Elizabeta Dimkova14657% games+6.3% vs expected
Michelle Chica + Louise Starr404 matchesnot enough data
Gabriela Boza + Pamela Petry Martinez213 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Hernandez + Alexandra Navas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alicia lopez
43W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
3
Alexandra Navas
77W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Louise Starr
72W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Katherine Hernandez
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.77
Pamela Petry Martinez
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%18%82%
2.63
3
Laura Curi
53W–76L career · 9 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Elizabeta Dimkova
40W–42L career · 11 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.53
Gabriela Boza
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.42
Elena Bluntzer
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Michelle Chica
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Miriam Fabregas
37W–130L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Arianne Llana
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.