Teams

The Slice Girls

Sweater Weather Fall League · Women 3.0

6 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2026-01-07vs Love Served ColdLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Velazquez / Kristi Payne vs Katelin Kight / KIMBERLY HUTTON BRICKHOUSE6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-12-21vs Pumpkin Smashers 2.5/3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Velazquez / Mica Manson vs J Kate Matzgannis / Suzanne Rich6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-12-20vs Love Served ColdWon 10
W#1 DoublesDorothy Heath Morris / Kristi Payne vs Jennifer Quinn / Jennifer Diane Moseley6-1, 6-1
2025-12-13vs Floyd Winter 2025Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Velazquez / Dorothy Heath Morris vs Brie Floyd / Veronica Kent2-6, 4-6
2025-12-13vs Rackettes OPLost 01
L#1 DoublesHannah Comer / Kristi Payne vs Sallie Kerr / Helen Furr7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-12-09vs Snow MercyLost 01
L#1 DoublesHannah Comer / Mica Manson vs Ashley Eatmon / Rhonda McKeever1-6, 1-6
2025-12-03vs Spice & Slice Fall 2025Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMica Manson / Kristi Payne vs Kelly OBrien / Mary Toohey7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-11-25vs Pumpkin Smashers 2.5/3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesLela Ingram / Heidi Velazquez vs Ximena Foster / Suzanne Rich6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-11-18vs Rackettes OPLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Velazquez / Mica Manson vs Sallie Kerr / Hillary Nystrom4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-11-17vs Floyd Winter 2025Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMica Manson / Hannah Comer vs Brie Floyd / Emma Turnbull0-6, 0-6
2025-11-16vs Snow MercyLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Velazquez / Kristi Payne vs Kristen Iwashchenko / Diane Klementowich1-6, 0-6
2025-11-09vs Spice & Slice Fall 2025Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Velazquez / Mica Manson vs Catherine Evanoff / Kelly OBrien3-6, 1-6
2025-11-04vs Love Served ColdLost 01
L#1 DoublesHannah Comer / Kristi Payne vs Jennifer Quinn / Katelin Kight3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Nicole Bouker
published
2.77
Dorothy Heath Morris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Heidi Velazquez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Hannah Comer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Mica Manson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lela Ingram
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mica Manson + Hannah Comer4639% games−3.2% vs expected
Mica Manson + Heidi Velazquez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Bouker
18W–21L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.97
Dorothy Heath Morris
23W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Heidi Velazquez
6W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Hannah Comer
11W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Mica Manson
11W–41L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Lela Ingram
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.