Teams

RN-MOODY

2024 · 2025 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

17 players · average NTRP 3.60 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Christine Epps
published 4
3.67
Joanna Roller
published
3.48
Stacy Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Tuti Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Teresa Moody
published
3.32
Julie Redick
published
3.26
Patricia Meservey
published
3.21
Diane Bloodworth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.18
Alana Alvarez
published 3.5
3.17
Frances Clay
published
3.16
Christine Helms
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Lisa McLendon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Brianne Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Mary Walker
published
Heather Cunningham
published
Julie Wilkerson
published
Rebecca McKee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Moody + Patricia Meservey91546% games+0.9% vs expected
Stacy Byrd + Frances Clay3450% games−0.1% vs expected
Joanna Roller + Tuti Hawkins1645% games−10.5% vs expected
Joanna Roller + Julie Redick224 matchesnot enough data
Diane Bloodworth + Tuti Hawkins134 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Moody + Joanna Roller303 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Moody + Christine Epps033 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Moody + Diane Bloodworth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Epps
26W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Joanna Roller
17W–32L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Stacy Byrd
44W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Tuti Hawkins
50W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.39
Teresa Moody
18W–40L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.33
Julie Redick
13W–26L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Patricia Meservey
14W–30L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.26
4
Diane Bloodworth
23W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.21
3.5
Alana Alvarez
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Frances Clay
10W–30L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.17
3.5
Christine Helms
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Lisa McLendon
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Brianne Smith
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Walker
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
Heather Cunningham
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Wilkerson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca McKee
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.