Teams

Cherokee/Karen Peay

Cherokee Fall ('22) - Southern Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level Adult 18 & Over 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.12 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Tri-Level Adult 18 & Over 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

April Johnson
published 4.5
Chantay Foley
published 4.5
4.11
Brooke Hilyer
published 4.5
4.00
Pamela Cleaver
published
Carol Edwards
published 4
3.73
Brittany Agee
published 4.5
3.72
Beth Reynolds
published 4
3.65
Whitney Higuera
published
3.52
Martina Negron
published
3.44
Carlotta Fulton
published 3.5
3.41
Anita Davis
published 3.5
Karen Peay
published
Kelsey Kennedy
published
Teressina Araiza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Cleaver + Carol Edwards3252% games+0.1% vs expected
Carlotta Fulton + Martina Negron213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
April Johnson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Chantay Foley
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Brooke Hilyer
34W–17L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
Pamela Cleaver
89W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.00
4
Carol Edwards
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Brittany Agee
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.73
4
Beth Reynolds
43W–18L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Whitney Higuera
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Martina Negron
25W–19L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Carlotta Fulton
37W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Anita Davis
37W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Karen Peay
14W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelsey Kennedy
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Teressina Araiza
27W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.