Teams

Eastern/ Phillips/18&Over5.0W

2024 18&over Women Day Winter · 5.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.83 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-28vs EBRCWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharlotte McDonough-Roarty / Natasha Scrivani vs Amy Collins / Elena DeBarbadillo6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCatherine Phillips / Renee Lee vs Jill Pancha / Amie Villarini5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-03-14vs EBRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Phillips / Jennifer Vallillo vs Amy Collins / Amie Villarini4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristen Bocina vs Elena DeBarbadillo3-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesDaniela Kelley / Adrienne Supino vs Carol Hammond / Kei Imanishi7-5, 6-1
2024-03-10vs EBRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarin Weiner / Natasha Scrivani vs Carol Hammond / Amy Collins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAbby Decker vs Elena DeBarbadillo7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCatherine Phillips / Sladja Carton vs Amanda Kaufman / Jill Pancha7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2024-03-03vs EBRCWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharlotte McDonough-Roarty / Natasha Scrivani vs Amanda Kaufman / Jill Pancha6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRenee Lee / Abby Decker vs Amy Collins / Elena DeBarbadillo6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-29vs EBRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Phillips / Jennifer Vallillo vs Elena DeBarbadillo / Amie Villarini5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Bocina vs Amy Collins1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJanine Roth / Erica Rosenberg vs Kei Imanishi / Kimberly Rosenthal3-6, 1-6
2024-02-15vs EBRCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJanine Roth / Sladja Carton vs Amy Collins / Amie Villarini1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Phillips / Adrienne Supino vs Kimberly Rosenthal / Kate Burke6-4, 6-3
2024-02-11vs EBRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesCharlotte McDonough-Roarty / Adrienne Supino vs Elena DeBarbadillo / Kimberly Rosenthal6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAbby Decker vs Amy Collins6-3, 5-4
L#2 DoublesCatherine Phillips / Karin Weiner vs Amanda Kaufman / Jill Pancha1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Eastern/ Phillips/18&Over5.0W5213820173
2EBRC2581330210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Charlotte McDonough-Roarty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.67
Adrienne Supino
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.64
Abby Decker
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.52
Catherine Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.49
Karin Weiner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.38
Janine Roth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.26
Kristen Bocina
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Daniela Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Jennifer Vallillo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Sladja Carton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.05
Erica Rosenberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Natasha Scrivani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Renee Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sladja Carton + Erica Rosenberg13266% games+12.8% vs expected
Jennifer Vallillo + Sladja Carton7158% games+2.8% vs expected
Adrienne Supino + Catherine Phillips4251% games−3.0% vs expected
Jennifer Vallillo + Erica Rosenberg4166% gamesnot enough data
Sladja Carton + Catherine Phillips4157% gamesnot enough data
Adrienne Supino + Daniela Kelley134 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Phillips + Janine Roth404 matchesnot enough data
Sladja Carton + Janine Roth033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Charlotte McDonough-Roarty
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.77
5
Adrienne Supino
44W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Abby Decker
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.64
5
Catherine Phillips
39W–29L career · 6 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.52
Karin Weiner
56W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.49
Janine Roth
25W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
4.38
Kristen Bocina
57W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Daniela Kelley
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Vallillo
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Sladja Carton
85W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
4.15
Erica Rosenberg
44W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.05
Natasha Scrivani
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Renee Lee
62W–34L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.