Teams

KNO NAVY

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs KC-RH YELLOWLost 13
W#1 DoublesCierra Olmsted / Sheila Edwards vs Julie Madison / Cheryl Amador6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Baesman vs Jan Dierkes2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Jane Webster vs Cari Eversman / Alicia Pucci4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Hunt / Brittany Wyeno vs Christi Hursta / Kim Sandman2-6, 1-6
2026-07-06vs HW GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Baesman / Barb Richards vs Anne-Marie Hukriede / Blythe Leinwand4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrittany Wyeno vs Kelly Kane3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Cathy Nowak vs Kristin Middlebrooks / Mary Morris3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJessica Hunt / Jane Webster vs Emily Maxfield / Jamie Vonfeldt4-6, 2-6
2026-06-29vs FOX REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesBarb Richards / Cierra Olmsted vs Whitney Baylor / Melissa Gilkison6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Baesman vs Leslie Porter6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Cathy Nowak vs Cait Weyhrich / Jennifer Lobb6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSheila Edwards / Jane Webster vs Lisa Licause / Jaime Martinez1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-22vs KC-CC SILVERSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCathy Nowak / Barb Richards vs Susan Whatley / Kellie Bonthron0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Baesman vs Stacey Lynn6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrittany Wyeno / Sheila Edwards vs Ashley Campsie / Carol Hertel1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Hunt / Jane Webster vs Kathryn Tobey / Lori Ann Satriano Arfsten7-6, 6-1
2026-06-15vs LEBTC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCathy Nowak / Sheila Edwards vs Lisa Garbin / Kara Edmiston Lavaux0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Baesman vs Janee Wren4-1
W#2 DoublesBarb Richards / Jessica Hunt vs Monica Panczer / Jamie Gardner7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrittany Wyeno / Jane Webster vs Philippa Biggi / Leann Koontz3-6, 6-7
2026-06-08vs SS-H REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesBarb Richards / Cierra Olmsted vs Rebecca McIlwaine / Renee Stemberger6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Baesman vs Amy Shearer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCathy Nowak / Sheila Edwards vs Kimberly MacKintosh / Tina Burton6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Brittany Wyeno vs Helena Huckabee / Nancy Post1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-01vs HRCA-N BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesCierra Olmsted / Barb Richards vs Alison Cargo / Kelin Williams6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrittany Wyeno vs Taylor Shields2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJane Webster / Cathy Nowak vs Tamara Rook / Stephanie Smith0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Jessica Hunt vs Pamela Abraham / Joanna Anderson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Sheila Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.92
Elizabeth Baesman
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.83
Cierra Olmsted
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Barb Richards
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.67
Jessica Hunt
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.65
Jane Webster
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Linda Prudhomme
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.61
Cathy Nowak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.34
Brittany Wyeno
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barb Richards + Sheila Edwards5168% games+11.1% vs expected
Cierra Olmsted + Barb Richards8458% games+8.4% vs expected
Barb Richards + Jessica Hunt3351% games+0.4% vs expected
Cathy Nowak + Linda Prudhomme7946% games−1.3% vs expected
Jessica Hunt + Linda Prudhomme5644% games−6.7% vs expected
Jessica Hunt + Jane Webster4251% games−7.3% vs expected
Cathy Nowak + Jane Webster2534% games−11.0% vs expected
Sheila Edwards + Cathy Nowak2342% games−16.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheila Edwards
31W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Elizabeth Baesman
121W–122L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Cierra Olmsted
33W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Barb Richards
107W–85L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Jessica Hunt
29W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Jane Webster
68W–125L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Linda Prudhomme
88W–90L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Cathy Nowak
39W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
2.5
Brittany Wyeno
9W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.