Teams

TCC/Lobatos-Topeka

Adult 18 & Over Mixed Tri-Level · 7.0-9.0 Mixed Tri-Level

17 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0-9.0 Mixed Tri-Level
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bulnes-Salina8221921228
2Wegner-Crestview64151535287
3Solovey/Loomis-Genesis45121534255
4Eccles-Topeka46141635270
5TCC/Lobatos-Topeka27101737278

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Michelle Bettis
published
Heather Fay
published 4.5
4.23
Santiago Rendon
published
3.75
Rachel Seitz
published
Chris Turner
published 4
3.75
Lawsen Lobatos-Dick
published
3.38
Elizabeth Herman
published 3.5
3.37
Loren Lobatos-Dick
published
Amanda Poole
published 3.5
3.18
Angie Gleason
published 3.5
3.15
Francis Katzer
published 3.5
3.08
Landen Lobatos-Dick
published
2.88
Liz Klausman
published
Jennifer Lane
published
Mark Bettis
published
Mel Brown
published
Robert Lane
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Bettis
81W–56L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Heather Fay
31W–41L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Santiago Rendon
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
4.23
Rachel Seitz
130W–67L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Chris Turner
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lawsen Lobatos-Dick
28W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.75
3.5
Elizabeth Herman
37W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Loren Lobatos-Dick
21W–42L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Amanda Poole
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Angie Gleason
54W–41L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Francis Katzer
25W–18L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Landen Lobatos-Dick
12W–24L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Liz Klausman
39W–46L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Jennifer Lane
46W–29L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Bettis
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mel Brown
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Lane
18W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.