Teams

BROADSTONE RC 18AM4.0A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Andorf / David Sebba vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-20vs ED MITCHELL PK 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Sebba / Mark Andorf vs Siva Bollineni / Aleksandr A Bgatov5-7, 1-6
2024-05-18vs HAL BARTHOLOMEW PK 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#1 SinglesDavid Sebba vs Eric Vang6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Oliver Wreford
published
4.02
David Sebba
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.94
John Sedar
published
3.89
Alexander Charn
published 4
3.81
Mark Andorf
published
3.78
William Bunce
published
Darin Carlsen
published 4
3.75
Michael Dozier
published
3.70
Kris Jornlin
published
3.63
Thomas Kim
published
3.45
Lance Chih
published
3.44
Eric Roscoe
published
3.34
John Andorf
published
3.20
Chris Jensen
published 3.5
Frederick Anderson
published
Greg Violette
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Dozier + Kris Jornlin314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Dozier + William Bunce213 matchesnot enough data
Kris Jornlin + Alexander Charn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Oliver Wreford
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
4.02
4.5
David Sebba
85W–38L career · 6 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
John Sedar
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Alexander Charn
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.89
Mark Andorf
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
William Bunce
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Darin Carlsen
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Dozier
34W–30L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Kris Jornlin
18W–20L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
Thomas Kim
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Lance Chih
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Eric Roscoe
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
John Andorf
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Chris Jensen
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Frederick Anderson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Greg Violette
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.