Teams

Koder: Genesis

2024 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-13vs Zinn-Burggraaf & Olafson: DMGWon 31
W#1 DoublesJanet Johnson / Mitzi Hetherton vs Katie Ward / Beth Eganhouse6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJoan Meek vs Danita Olafson6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Kalianov / Kathryn Wieland vs Donnis Rafferty / Jennifer Berdovich2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSarah Graf vs Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-30vs Snedegar & Hagan: LifetimeWon 32
W#1 DoublesLee Johnson / Kathryn Wieland vs Heidi Snedegar / Joan Gray6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMegan Kaufman vs Jennifer Heil4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Johnson / Joy Bachmann vs Renea Hagan / Nina Pack1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAmy Upright vs Corinne Goode6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAshleysha Pujari / Karen Kalianov vs Karen Kraemer / Holly Rebelez3-6, 1-6
2024-02-17vs Snedegar & Hagan: LifetimeLost 23
W#1 DoublesKathryn Wieland / Mitzi Hetherton vs Holly Rebelez / Karen Kraemer7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Graf vs Jennifer Heil1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJune MacKay / Joy Bachmann vs Joan Gray / Renea Hagan4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesJoan Meek vs Corinne Goode6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLee Johnson / Terri Bunting vs Heidi Snedegar / Julie Merfeld2-6, 2-6
2024-02-03vs Zinn-Burggraaf & Olafson: DMGWon 32
W#1 DoublesMegan Kaufman / Mitzi Hetherton vs Brandee Morrow / Danita Olafson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Upright vs Megan Elfers1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Kalianov / Joy Bachmann vs Donnis Rafferty / Sonja Heying2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAshleysha Pujari vs Gwen Conte1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLee Johnson / Kathryn Wieland vs Christina Jarck / Katie Ward7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Amy Upright
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Megan Kaufman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Joan Meek
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.18
Sarah Graf
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
3.16
Joy Bachmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Mitzi Hetherton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Dana McBratney
published 3.5
2.87
Emilie Pohlman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
Ashleysha Pujari
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.72
Karen Kalianov
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Janice Koder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Terri Bunting
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
June MacKay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Sissel
published
Kathryn Wieland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lee Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Bachmann + Mitzi Hetherton12659% games+9.8% vs expected
Janet Johnson + Joy Bachmann3544% games−2.0% vs expected
Joy Bachmann + June MacKay0636% gamesnot enough data
Dana McBratney + June MacKay0525% gamesnot enough data
Lee Johnson + Joan Meek1444% gamesnot enough data
Karen Kalianov + Mitzi Hetherton1437% gamesnot enough data
Joy Bachmann + Karen Kalianov134 matchesnot enough data
Joy Bachmann + Joan Meek224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Upright
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Megan Kaufman
24W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.31
Joan Meek
33W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.19
Sarah Graf
38W–22L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.18
Joy Bachmann
30W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Mitzi Hetherton
51W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.08
3.5
Dana McBratney
12W–21L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Emilie Pohlman
18W–9L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Ashleysha Pujari
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Kalianov
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.72
Janice Koder
29W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.65
Terri Bunting
11W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
99%1%<1%
2.65
Janet Johnson
31W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
June MacKay
12W–36L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Karen Sissel
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathryn Wieland
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lee Johnson
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.