Teams

Maureen Smith - Manor

2025 Montgomery Doubles Fall Women · Montgomery Doubles Fall 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Fall 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Dawn Willard
published 3.5
Diana DePaul
published 3.5
3.23
Maureen Smith
published
3.20
3.13
Rebecca Landers
published
3.05
Meredith Webb
published
3.03
Melissa Valencia
published
2.96
Sara Foulkes
published
2.66
Laura Davis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.38
Helen Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Katie Brand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Joan Anson
published
Julie Gutierrez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Foulkes + Rebecca Landers134 matchesnot enough data
Laura Davis + Katie Brand044 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Smith + Melissa Valencia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawn Willard
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Diana DePaul
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Smith
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Christina Shioutakon
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Rebecca Landers
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Meredith Webb
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Melissa Valencia
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Sara Foulkes
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Laura Davis
5W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Helen Campbell
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.38
Katie Brand
0W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.24
Joan Anson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Gutierrez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.