Teams

CROWN RED

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-23vs RVR REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesFrancisco Elias / Kristen Foote vs Tami Cassetty / Mike Cassetty6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Braeger / Ted Davenport vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-19vs GSCC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesPeg Devan / Peter Jacobson vs Max Weiss / Dawn Cleveland2-6, 1-6
2024-05-16vs GSCC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesPeter Jacobson / Peg Devan vs Max Weiss / Dawn Cleveland2-6
2024-05-09vs RVR REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Braeger / Joshua Nudd vs Leslie Keery / Sean Keery6-0, 6-0
2024-04-28vs RVR REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeg Devan / Peter Jacobson vs Susan Cheney / Ken Wanko3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKristen Foote / Francisco Elias vs Leslie Keery / Sean Keery6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Shelley Lundh
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.46
Alexandra Braeger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Mark Terkun
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Francisco Elias
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.25
Peg Devan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Aarjave Shah
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Brandi Vinger
published 3.5
3.24
Kristen Foote
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Joshua Nudd
published
Karen Lambert
published
Peter Jacobson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ted Davenport
published
Tom Karrel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Foote + Francisco Elias17658% games+12.8% vs expected
Peg Devan + Peter Jacobson41242% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shelley Lundh
75W–121L career · 6 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Alexandra Braeger
72W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Mark Terkun
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Francisco Elias
81W–30L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Peg Devan
21W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Aarjave Shah
22W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brandi Vinger
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristen Foote
47W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Joshua Nudd
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Lambert
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Jacobson
22W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ted Davenport
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Karrel
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.