Teams

LTPO-Powell/Westport_40+Combo_5.5

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Men 5.5 Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-22vs LJTheisen/CSDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDennis Pirkl / George Chast vs David James / Baxter Price7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCharles Duquemin / Michael Simmer vs Steve Riddle / Mark Kincer4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-15vs LJTheisen/CSDWon 20
W#1 DoublesGeorge Chast / Tom Mullen vs Richard Kaake / Jeff Reiner6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEdwin Stinson / John Murphy vs Baxter Price / Neil McLean6-0, 6-0
2022-09-08vs LJTheisen/CSDWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharles Duquemin / Michael Palmer vs Steve Riddle / Jeff Reiner2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-01vs LJTheisen/CSDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEdwin Stinson / John Murphy vs David James / Larry Townley6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGeorge Chast / Todd Wulfhorst vs Jon Theisen / Mark Kincer2-6, 6-7
2022-08-25vs LJTheisen/CSDWon 20
W#1 DoublesEdwin Stinson / John Murphy vs Neil McLean / Jeff Reiner6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCharles Duquemin / George Chast vs Steve Riddle / Baxter Price6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 5.5 Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
John Murphy
published
3.06
Tom Mullen
published
2.87
Dennis Pirkl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Charles Duquemin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Edwin Stinson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Todd Wulfhorst
published
2.65
David Rosselli
published 3
2.63
George Chast
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Timothy Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Duquemin + Edwin Stinson3542% gamesnot enough data
Charles Duquemin + George Chast5065% gamesnot enough data
Charles Duquemin + Todd Wulfhorst134 matchesnot enough data
Dennis Pirkl + George Chast134 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Powell + George Chast213 matchesnot enough data
Dennis Pirkl + Edwin Stinson123 matchesnot enough data
George Chast + Edwin Stinson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Murphy
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
Tom Mullen
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Dennis Pirkl
96W–66L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Charles Duquemin
55W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Edwin Stinson
62W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Todd Wulfhorst
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
David Rosselli
4W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
George Chast
68W–94L career · 9 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
Timothy Powell
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.