Teams

CPD

Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / ALLEGHENY MNTN.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-25vs AMDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Werst / Jerry Beck vs David Yensen / Lloyd Richless6-3
W#2 DoublesDon Hutchison / David Schlosser vs Steve Greco / John Kejas6-2
L#3 DoublesEric Glatsky / Greg Stauffer vs William Pilardi / Joseph DAngelo1-6
2026-07-25vs AMDLost 03
L#1 DoublesDon Hutchison / James Werst vs John Kejas / Frank Bova4-6
L#2 DoublesDennis Funk / Eric Glatsky vs Steve Greco / Karl Boye4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Moyer / Greg Stauffer vs Joseph DAngelo / Robert Kmetik4-6
2026-07-25vs AMDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJerry Beck / Eric Glatsky vs Charles Taylor / Robert Kmetik3-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Moyer / Dennis Funk vs David Thompson / Frank Haley7-5
2026-07-25vs AMDWon 21
W#1 DoublesDon Hutchison / David Schlosser vs Charles Taylor / Frank Bova7-5
L#2 DoublesMichael Moyer / Dennis Funk vs Frank Haley / David Thompson5-7
W#3 DoublesJames Werst / Jerry Beck vs William Pilardi / Karl Boye6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AMD0475553
2CPD0457760

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Michael Moyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
David Schlosser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
James Werst
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Eric Glatsky
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Don Hutchison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.34
Dennis Funk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Greg Stauffer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jerry Beck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Moshos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Don Hutchison + David Schlosser15262% games+6.9% vs expected
Dennis Funk + Michael Moyer4165% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Funk + Eric Glatsky134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Moyer
63W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.98
4
David Schlosser
62W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
James Werst
7W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Eric Glatsky
286W–231L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Don Hutchison
19W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.65
3.5
Dennis Funk
31W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Greg Stauffer
86W–141L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Jerry Beck
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Moshos
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.