Teams

Dante Fascell - Wilner

2022 Miami-Dade Social South Florida Women's Double Tennis · Alpha 2

9 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-04-26vs Key Biscayne (KBTA) - FestaWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesStacy Gatcliffe / Mariola Idrobo vs Carla Martin / Sabine Zerarka6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2022-04-12Lost 01
L#2 Female DoublesMariola Idrobo / Stacy Gatcliffe vs Michele Battle / Maria Stanham3-6, 2-6
2022-03-01Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesStacy Gatcliffe / Mariola Idrobo vs Clarice Borges / Jeanette Bibliowicz6-4, 7-5
2022-02-15vs Doral Park - AndradeWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesStacy Gatcliffe / Martha Spillers vs Solange Cancian / Clarys Kimputu4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-02-08Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesMariola Idrobo / Stacy Gatcliffe vs Lisa Carrol / Stacey Cooper6-2, 6-4
2022-01-18vs Royal Palm - SalgadoLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesAndrea Shosfy / Mariola Idrobo vs Brenda Salgado / Michelle Pasko7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2021-12-07vs Key Biscayne (The Ritz) - deCampsLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesStacy Gatcliffe / Mariola Idrobo vs Ileana Gill / Liliana Paez4-6, 5-7
2021-11-09vs Riviera Prep - Ruiz-VelazcoLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesMariola Idrobo / Donna Feldman vs Tania Rodriguez / XIMENA OTERO4-6, 4-6
2021-10-26Won 10
W#5 Female DoublesMartha Spillers / Stacy Gatcliffe vs Nancy Ney / Loretta Nido6-0, 6-3
2021-10-12vs Deering Bay - PorterSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesMariola Idrobo / Belinda Sime vs CAROLINA CAMPUZANO / Sonnia Viyella6-7, 4-6
W#4 Female DoublesStacy Gatcliffe / Martha Spillers vs Debbie Antonelli / Josefina Sussmane6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Alpha 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Helena Maseda
usually #1 Female Doubles 46%, also #5 Female Doubles 36% · published 4.5
3.88
Mariola Idrobo
usually #2 Female Doubles 63%, also #3 Female Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Emma Zapata
published 4
3.71
3.59
Belinda Sime
published 4
3.34
Stacy Gatcliffe
usually #2 Female Doubles 63%, also #4 Female Doubles 13% · published
3.26
Susan Ashbel
published
3.21
Martha Spillers
published
3.19
Karen Zinn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Gatcliffe + Mariola Idrobo11651% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Helena Maseda
176W–66L career · 11 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
Mariola Idrobo
105W–81L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Emma Zapata
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Carolyn Seckinger
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Belinda Sime
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
Stacy Gatcliffe
129W–84L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
Susan Ashbel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Martha Spillers
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Karen Zinn
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.