Teams

1*TDavies-CHCC

2024 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-30vs 5*LBible-EnoLost 01
L#2 SinglesCourtney Whilden vs Ragini Singh2-6, 5-7
2024-07-24vs 2*MLong-EnoWon 21
L#1 SinglesMarci Hansen vs Kinsey Wennerstrom3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAdrian Davies vs Penny Kraft7-6, 7-5
W#3 SinglesJoanna Hooten vs Jill Hathorn2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-23vs 4*KGreen-EnoSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMarci Hansen vs Emily Spencer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAdrian Davies vs Keshia Green1-6, 0-6
2024-06-25vs 3*LSimmons-SVCWon 10
W#1 SinglesCourtney Whilden vs Laura Gallaher6-4, 6-4
2024-06-18vs 6*DAllen-DFCWon 10
W#3 SinglesAdrian Davies vs Christine Kruse6-1, 6-2
2024-06-11vs 9*KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 02
L#2 SinglesAdrian Davies vs Rhiannon Ludington0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJoanna Hooten vs Kensy Ryan2-6, 1-6
2024-05-28vs 7*LDubois-EnoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMarci Hansen vs Christina Pipkin2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCourtney Whilden vs Jesse Banks4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Joli Stockwell
published
2.99
Marci Hansen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.96
Joanna Hooten
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.79
Courtney Whilden
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Courtney Chacos
published 3
2.75
Elizabeth Loughrey
published
2.69
Adrian Davies
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marci Hansen + Courtney Whilden3251% gamesnot enough data
Marci Hansen + Joanna Hooten134 matchesnot enough data
Adrian Davies + Courtney Whilden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joli Stockwell
25W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
3
Marci Hansen
51W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Joanna Hooten
76W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Courtney Whilden
49W–69L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Courtney Chacos
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elizabeth Loughrey
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Adrian Davies
47W–34L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.